AE5NE

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There’s no way to be viable against a heavily government-subsidized competitor who operates in a country with little to no labor, environmental, or safety regulation.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

yes, it looks at a fine-grained clock, usually a cycle counter provided by the CPU for this purpose, to aggregate total on-cpu time for each process.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

I think a lot of modern kernels are “tickless” - they don’t use a timeslice timer, and only context switch on IO interrupt, process yield, or when timeouts are specifically requested (including capping cpu-bound processes). https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tickless_kernel

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Surely you mean 0.0999999931082% ?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Now I think my client (Memmy) is wonky too, because it can’t follow any of these links! Will try the web UI.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Ah, I read the requestor as wanting to disallow body text.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Maybe the instance I’m on is wonky, because I can’t even find those communities - I just get the “top”/”default” type communities ala reddit: technology, news, etc, which are all linked mass media articles.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The opposite of that request, yes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

More policy and culture than implementation. Rarely see pages of links to mass media sites on your average phpBB, though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I have thought for a while that the next “reddit” should be usenet with a client having advanced filtering, local scoring, etc. Maybe where the client reports to/reads from a shared spam database.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (9 children)

I dont mean a chat/conversation-specific community, I mean a collection of communities that are more people interacting than links being posted.

Especially for hobby, parenting, philosophy, politics, technical discussions, etc.

 

It seems like any platform that features link aggregation is soon overrun by bots and self-promoters trying to drive traffic, and pages and pages of link posts versus pages and pages of people talking.

Are there any lemmy instances or other defederated networks that focus on Q&A, niche communities, and people conversing, instead?

view more: next ›