Adderbox76

The full saying is "Free as in Speech, not Free as in Beer"

Basically the "Free" in free means that it's free to do with as you please, modify, etc... But not free as in "here's a free product...like getting a free beer"

This software is extensively free (as in beer)

No...it's not. It's free to download and to use, but the expectation that people contribute in exchange for using it is how FOSS has always worked.

That doesn't necessarily mean monetary. But contributing can be helping with user guides, or making youtube tutorials, or even just extending the reach of the program to friends and family by talking about it.

There are many ways to contribute, and money is one. But the notion that Open Source software is "free as in beer" has never been correct. Users have an expectation to contribute...period.

Unfortunately, there has always been the issue that a not-insignificant percentage of users of FOSS software believe the FREE part means "free as in beer" and take umbrage when asked to contribute.

I've long been a proponent (and I know I'm in a minority) that has advocated for a shift in the marketing of FOSS applications from "donation based" to "value based". Meaning that the expectation is that if you enjoy the software, you pay an amount that you believe is commensurate to your use. This is voluntarily of course...if you can't pay, than please use it and enjoy it. But those who can pay, should pay...at least a little bit, to offset the costs for those who can't.

It's more or less that the wording of FOSS apps needs to change so that you are expected to contribute if you can.

Just my opinion. Like I said, I know I'm in the minority. Just not a fan of the percentage of users that has always existed that (falsely) think that asking for money for your project is somehow anathema to the Open Source ideal and whine whenever they're asked to contribute.

Maybe. But I'd imagine it's an attempt to force Putin to move some troops around; taking them from other areas to defend this new front.

TRUMP:  "We'll have it fixed so good you're not going to have to vote."

MEDIA: "Oh there he goes again with his ''deliberately ambiguous' phrasing..."

What fucking part of that sentence was ambiguous???

And this is why the for-profit american justice system isn't about rehabilitation.

A supply of slave labour requires recidivism.

America is barbaric.

I'm not even an American and I would be so psyched by a Mark Kelly run for president.

Then all we would need would be to get Chris Hatfield as or PM up here and it would be an intelligent astronaut super hemisphere.

Oh believe me, I know. I agree.

but the argument nowadays is that common usage dictates that both are now "acceptable", similar to how apparently "literally" now effectively means "figuratively" because everyone uses it.

Ha! How much time have you got?

Shallow and pedantic is my speciality.

But for the sake of brevity I'll simply say that hearing (or reading) less in cases where fewer would be more appropriate is like driving an ice pick into my brain.

Yes...both are technically correct, but I have to fight the urge to be that guy whenever I hear it.

It's been a long time since I last installed Linux on a two hard-drive system, so take this advice as "likely not necessary, but will probably fix your issue"

The installer asks whether or not you want to "replace" the existing OS or install alongside. And if you're fairly new to linux (like I was at the time) it can be tricky to see at a glance which hard-drive you want to install it to and which you don't.

So to be doubly cautious and make sure that didn't happen, I simply unplugged my secondary harddrive during the install so that the installer would automatically be reading the correct one. Then all I had to do was choose "replace" or "install alongside" without worrying about anything else.

The drawback to that was, once the install was complete and I re-attached my second drive, I had to configure it to auto-mount and do some work on that, but at least my computer was working.

If I'm being honest, So many little distros just come and go that I've stopped bothering to learn about any of them until they have enough support that I know the devs aren't going to just vanish in six months.

I never saw those moments as Kif being homophobic. I read it as a subordinate being repulsed by the idea of seeing his commanding officer naked.