CITRUS

I thought the UK already has nukes what the hell does this even do?

Is Chile the best or worst country for high speed rail?

THIS IS WHAT'S HAPPENING IN XINJIANG THAT CHINA DOESN'T WANT US TO KNOW!!!

To be honest I am pretty put off that they discredit some of the biggest strides in decolonization, and I think it stems from a lack of class analysis. Why do they see exploitation of the land for the good of all as settler colonialism?

From what I have garnered so far, settler colonialism is based on hierarchy of "national classes" (for lack of a better word). Nations have a class of proles and bourgeoisie, when in a settler colonial state the bourgeoisie give a their proletarian cultural group a priority and kickbacks for settling hence the bourgeois position. So the settler proles and oppressed proles hold contradicting positions, as long as the settler proles hold a bourgeois position.

We have seen settlers and indigenous nations work together to overthrow colonialism, in the USSR, China, Cuba and even with bourgeois democratic states in LatAm. Why is this? I believe it is because the class of settlers have been proletarianized enough to align with the oppressed and synthesize into a new state. Russians, Han Chinese, and Spaniards under the boot of Imperialsm had proletarian positions, and thus could synthesize with any oppressed nationalities With DOTPs specifically we see the first blow to settler colonialism, the elimination of the bourgeoisie as an oppressing class and thus the need for nations in the first place has started crumbling.

Sadly Tuck and Yang's Liberalism holds them back from a class analysis, but their own class interests allow them to address settler colonialism. At the moment, they ARE right in saying that the most progressive way to decolonize the US is putting land back in Indigenous hands (proletarian hands). This is because as long as US Imperialism exists (as it does now) the Euro Americans hold a bourgeois and counter revolutionary position. (keep in mind this is not an exact science, and anglos are being proletarianized more and more each day. Hell I am a white settler and I am living barely on paycheck to paycheck).

What happens is the Indigenous revolutionary kernel is much more developed compared to the Settler revolutionary kernel. Thus the indigenous people hold a vanguard position, as any indigenous population has always had across history. Only when settler's kernel is developed enough can it synthesize with the oppressed nations into a DOTP. And you can see indigenous leaders for decolonization even without a class analysis advocate for this synthesis. The more settlers work together with the oppressed nations, the less it will be solely indigenous but until that happens it holds an indigenous character (if that makes sense)

Agh a "centrist" past their prime. So they say they don't have political opinion cause they "aren't interested in politics" or "I'm better than these rAdICaLS". I mean I think it could work out, Parenti starts off destroying fascists and critiques the USSR so I think if they see any "red flags of a tankie" they are already too deep in the book. I say go for it, but it's your life.

Now how conservative? Racist, homophobic, or transphobic?

Why is it based against NATO but then hates on the DPRK and calls the Native Americans “landlords”? It even talks a bout China wanting to dismantle the West’s power but then calls Isn’t real a “nerdy nephew”, what political stance is this? I’m so confused...

thats probably one of my favorites, love how they morph Hitler into a napoleon bean.

Ah Capitalist South Korea bringing you Squid Game and Bong Joon Ho's Snowpiercer and Parasite.

Yeah, I feel like California would be a good place to consolidate our MLs in America. It has lots of Bernie supporters, Worsening conditions for the poor (price of houses, car centric, huge race disparity, etc) a discontent with the current government. But also geographically strategic, it's huge, the rockies act as a buffer from the rest of the US, far away from Washington, and would be close enough to get aid from China. Economically it would be a huge dent in the American bourgeoisie, and it could be swing to the back of the legs for the eventual demise of the Empire.

Being in a red state, I also agree our country folk have good values just misinformed. I have an idea to make an ML party, but it's ambiguous in its iconography as not to scare off the public. All we need to do is gain their trust with actions, and describe our mission without the "scary" words then we can rope them in to Socialism.

The thing is we are too politically and physically divided. Do you think it's possible for a region of the US to break off, instead of the whole country, and if so where?