ChaoticNeutralCzech

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
 
[–] [email protected] 50 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Do they realize this may be the only way some people can legally play the games? I can imagine lots of disabilities that only let people play with a niche controller

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I thought eating beef was taboo in India regardless of religion, as in – you could get away with it in private but good luck finding a butcher that would prepare one without ruining your reputation in the neighborhood. The taste is not good enough to risk it. However, (not) eating beef is an actual choice if you go abroad.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If the amount is 2.5 %/yr of non-essentials, there is still lots of ways one could make money significantly faster with a good business strategy and lots of luck, and have a probability of eventually reaching a net worth in the billions. However, there's a difference between following the letter of the “law” and its spirit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It could work if you aggregated incompatible providers in the same category (such as weather) into one big aggregate API. That way, people wouldn’t need to refactor if their favorite API provider ramps up pricing or dies. But how would I trust you to keep offering the same service at a good price point instead of an established meteorological institution? Also, I think weather aggregators already exist.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I think they mean an API-aggregating API that would be called “100% API” with loads of services supported but no idea how to pay for all that.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Do they actually have the ambition to redefine the word strand like Inception (2010) literally redefined inception?