Article seems to be behind a paywall.
Cow_says_moo
You must not have read the post properly then. It comes from linux's sbin.
Scientists are evil and just enjoy giving mice Alzheimer's.
For those who didn't read the article, so far it's only being tested in mice with promising results.
Would be nice if this would get peer reviewed and confirmed. Until then, I wouldn't count on this changing anything.
Better use a cipher then for your pen and paper transmission. Invisible ink as well.
Password rotation isn't necessary anymore according to NIST. Use long/strong unique passwords combined with MFA.
Furthermore, public wifi risk is overblown. As long as you ensure encrypted communication, you're good.
This has no direct effect on privacy by the way.
Source: I'm an information Security manager.
The 1990s just called. They want their article back.
No one is still running a lot of bare metal. Everything is virtualized at the bare minimum, or containerized or Serverless code.
Furthermore the article doesn't really teach you anything new except for the existence of the hypervisor layer. Threats and controls are mostly the same between physical and virtualized.
:Edit: just saw you wrote this article. Sorry for the harsh criticism, but I stand by it. Try to be more accurate with your threat and control assessments or write about more niche technology.
They're probably using MS exchange /s
It's much shorter. Definitely not a bigger fish 🧙♂️
My wife and I are saving up to do something similar in about 5 years. Any recommendations/things you've learnt you'd like to share?
I use alt 0160 for a non-line breaking space.