Dark_Arc

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Yeah this is either projection because they didn't see the mainstream media doing it or an attempt to drive a wedge and create controversy where there shouldn't be any.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

My concern is more so if he gets elected, he might try to justify "emergency powers" citing political violence as history has shown with other authoritarians.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure, there's a cost to breaking things up, all multiprocessing and multithreading comes at a cost. That said, in my evaluation, single for "unity builds" are garbage; sometimes a few files are used to get some multiprocessing back (... as the GitHub you mentioned references).

They're mostly a way to just minimize the amount of translation units so that you don't have the "I changed a central header that all my files include and now I need to rebuild the world" (with a world that includes many many small translation units) problem (this is arguably worse on Windows because process spawning is more expensive).

Unity builds as a whole are very very niche and you're almost always better off doing a more targeted analysis of where your build (or often more importantly, incremental build) is expensive and making appropriate changes. Note that large C++ projects like llvm, chromium, etc do NOT use unity builds (almost certainly, because they are not more efficient in any sense).

I'm not even sure how they got started, presumably they were mostly a way to get LTO without LTO. They're absolutely awful for incremental builds.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Slow compared to what exactly...?

The worst part about headers is needing to reprocess the whole header from scratch ... but precompiled headers largely solve that (or just using smaller more targeted header files).

Even in those cases there's something to be said for the extreme parallelism in a C++ build. You give some of that up with modules for better code organization and in some cases it does help build times, but I've heard in others it hurts build times (a fair bit of that might just be inexperience with the feature/best practices and immature implementations, but alas).

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (5 children)

There's no precompiler in C++. There's a preprocessor but that's something entirely different. It's also not a slow portion of the compile process typically.

C++ is getting to the point where modules might work well enough to do something useful with them, but they remove the need for #include preprocessor directives to share code.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

That's a false equivalence. Building up society as a whole is better than trying to determine "the most relevant" voices.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not a new problem; I remember back in 2016 looking up one MAGA supporter on Twitter that seemed EXTREMELY enthusiastic via reverse image search.

I ended up finding a girl in Brazil that had presumably never set foot in "Nebraska" where this MAGA supporter was allegedly "born and raised."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

That's when you use different exit codes. 1 for failure during simulation, 2 for simulation failed.

Shame they wouldn't listen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What did you hate about it? I mean CentOS is fine other than IBM killed it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

By integrating everything into it, it has become a good enough medium of communication for almost everything.

Except that's not at all what we've done.

The only reason English dominates is because it's the dominant language of the world super powers following world war II. It's not because of some special design, principle, or properties.

English isn't just "make up whatever rules and put them wherever", particularly formal English which is what we're talking about in the context of education.

Really, a better argument against changing the spelling is the classic "standards" xkcd, where now you're just making another dialect of English where they spell words differently again, and now it needs to be adopted, fracturing the language further.

Language will evolve with or without direction. We have the structure in the form of schools to actually evolve it with direction in the name of making things more consistent and intuitive. We should use it, that's all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

The old "why try to do anything because it will never be perfect" argument never holds water.

21
TikTok’s Pro-China Tilt (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

The times dives into an intelligence report on how TikTok's political algorithm anomalies align with the CCP's Geostrategic Objectives https://networkcontagion.us/wp-content/uploads/A-Tik-Tok-ing-Timebomb_12.21.23.pdf

This report highlights major differences in the prevalence of hashtags related to subjects like Hong Kong Protests, Tainanmen Square, Tibet, the South China Sea, Taiwan, Uyghurs, Pro-Ukraine, and Pro-Isreal when compared to other major social media platforms.

Additionally the times cited a Wall Street Journal analysis (https://www.wsj.com/tech/tiktok-israel-gaza-hamas-war-a5dfa0ee) which "found evidence that TikTok was promoting extreme content, especially against Israel. (China has generally sided with Hamas.)"

0
TikTok’s Pro-China Tilt (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

The times dives into an intelligence report on how TikTok's political algorithm anomalies align with the CCP's Geostrategic Objectives https://networkcontagion.us/wp-content/uploads/A-Tik-Tok-ing-Timebomb_12.21.23.pdf

This report highlights major differences in the prevalence of hashtags related to subjects like Hong Kong Protests, Tainanmen Square, Tibet, the South China Sea, Taiwan, Uyghurs, Pro-Ukraine, and Pro-Isreal when compared to other major social media platforms.

Additionally the times cited a Wall Street Journal analysis (https://www.wsj.com/tech/tiktok-israel-gaza-hamas-war-a5dfa0ee) which "found evidence that TikTok was promoting extreme content, especially against Israel. (China has generally sided with Hamas.)"

4
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Hi all,

I'm visiting a relative that has a Google WiFi system with multiple access points. There's an access point literally right next to me that I can see in the KDE BSSID list with 100% connection strength.

For some reason, it's instead picking a BSSID with only 60% strength. Does anyone have any thoughts on why it's choosing this access point instead of one of the others? Is this something the Google WiFi controls/suggests to the laptop, is something bugged, or is there a good reason Linux might be choosing this particular access point?

EDIT: It turns out the access point placement was actually just really bad, and the access point in question was not even making it to the rest of the LAN... The speed difference between my phone and laptop seems to be just that, something to do with a difference between the framework and the Pixel's wireless cards (or drivers). Even with everything corrected, the Pixel is significantly out performing the framework.

view more: next ›