DavidGarcia

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 39 points 5 days ago (17 children)

I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 weeks ago

Heavens, Gates!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

TiddlyWiki sounds like something else entirely

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

wasm is so cool

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

... to automate the economy of the Soviet Union?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

people need to take a step back and realize we have the capability to trap quasi-omnipotent quasi-demons in our personal computers

yeah they lie a lot and rarely do what you want them to, but that's just what demons do

And it's all powered by some dark crystals created with light magic that slowly poison the planet

that's some arcane bullshit

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (12 children)

uh ackchuyally it's not the speed of light

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago

the cricket that rode the nuclear man hole cover

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (8 children)

devil's advocate: this will save the vast majority of user (which are completely tech illiterate) from loosing their most important data

lets be real, none of them will use a private or foss backup solution any time soon.

I'd rather not they loose their important family photos for that oh so horrible crime of offending my privacy nerd sensibilities

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

That's the point of the repuation system.

It's a very hard problem, I'll give you that.

What you need is, each instance and community collects reputation in the federation. then users posting on those instances can collect reputation on those. basically by not being banned or massively downvoted. Your reputation is weighted by the reputation of each you collected it from instance.

Each users identity is tied to some key that collects reputation, that you generate new identities from from for each instance/community/post. Like how some credit card services give you a new credit card number for each new website.

Admins don't know who you are, but they can see and verify your reputation.

Then instance/community admins can decide if they want a different weighting. For example, to completely disregard the reputation by some instance or make one you like 10x more important.

You could get an ordered list of posts or pseudonymous users based on the reputation. Untrustworthy users will glow like a christmas tree.

That would be one way to do it. It's hard to make it water tight, but any improvements would be better than the current fediworse.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It doesn't have to be.

You could keep the general structure and functioning while improving privacy.

For example, by obfuscating post history, anonymous posting or assigning a user pseudonym per instance/community, auto-deleting old posts/comments. All optional features of course. Let instances/communites decide which of these features they want.

Keep the structure of Lemmy with it's Reddit-like-ness and instances, but give users, instances and communities more control over data privacy.

Sure it's harder to implement, you need some minimal-knowledge reputation system, but there is nothing fundamental preventing that from being possible.

The nice thing about federation is that one instance/community can stay the same data-leaking privacy mess, if they so prefer. While others could operate analogous to 4-chan (or anything in between).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I would love to have a switch to turn off the autism at will, if that actually worked and had no side effects.

But that seems like an impossibity in this current pharma system.

Patents absolutely destroyed the incentive to sell the best drugs, instead the incentive is to sell dangerous drugs that can be patented and maximally milked for money.

view more: next ›