DemBoSain

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You just know this is going to change some minds about climate-change, but in a bad, pro-climate-change kind of way.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

My Halloween costume is going to be sick this year. But next year I'll be going as a cancer patient.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago

911, what's your emergency?

I found a dead body on the side of the road.

Where are you? I'm sending police to you now.

Uhh, I touched it.

OK, don't do that. Do you have hand sanitizer?

I may have eaten some.

...

Also, I tripped. I may have slipped inside.

What does that mean?

I...completed.

Listen just stay where you are, police are on their way.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Reporting on court proceedings is not politics.

Reporting on court proceedings involving a currently running presidential candidate is inherently political.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (3 children)

“The majority opinion ignores that countless Michigan families rely on the registry to ensure their safety. ... Registration provides vital information for the parent who must choose a babysitter or entrust a child with a volunteer coach,” said Zahra, who was joined by Justice David Viviano.

Yes, of course the "ends justify the means" defense.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

But...mud bricks? Did they make any mud bricks?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

Because the American system provides for a rich ecosystem of middlemen and lobbyists. If we switch to Universal Healthcare, what will they do? Code?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

"...Seeming..."

FUCK the New York Times. They're so afraid of sounding biased they're incapable of just reporting the news. This is a CLEAR violation of Twitter rules.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I knew they had gardens but I'd completely ruled out octopus farms.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This would be a good article if the pictures actually showed people wearing the clothes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

The election cycle is only 4 years long? It was forgotten by then.

Reagan won so many states because Mondale was extremely unpopular. He was Carter's VP, and Carter had been successfully painted as our weakest president by Republicans. Mondale also gave a speech where he said he would raise taxes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Reagan was shot 3 years before the election.

 
 

From my previous comment, it looks like NHTSA is moving faster than I predicted. We're now at step 1, with this Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

(edit: I jumped the gun, we're still at step '0' on my original list)

Most of this notice seems to be a report on why 'impaired driving' is bad. I see alcohol, cannabis, mobile phone use, drowsiness...etc.

Due to technology immaturity and a lack of testing protocols, drugged driving is not being considered in this advance notice of proposed rulemaking.

Makes sense.

There is no clear and consistent engineering or industry definition of ‘‘impairment.’’

Yep, another unclear request by Congress.

NHTSA believes that Congress did not intend to limit NHTSA’s efforts under BIL to alcohol impairment.

Okay, that's fair.

Camera-based-systems, however, are increasingly feasible and common in vehicles.

Uh-oh...

The Safety Act also contains a ‘‘make inoperative’’ provision, which prohibits certain entities from knowingly modifying or deactivating any part of a device or element of design installed in or on a motor vehicle in compliance with an applicable FMVSS. Those entities include vehicle manufacturers, distributors, dealers, rental companies, and repair businesses. Notably, the make inoperative prohibition does not apply to individual vehicle owners. While NHTSA encourages individual vehicle owners not to degrade the safety of their vehicles or equipment by removing, modifying, or deactivating a safety system, the Safety Act does not prohibit them from doing so. This creates a potential source of issues for solutions that lack consumer acceptance, since individual owners would not be prohibited by Federal law from removing or modifying those systems (i.e., using defeat mechanisms).

Note that "make inoperative" does not apply to a "kill switch" in this case. NHTSA uses the term to mean "disabling required safety devices". For example, as an individual vehicle owner, it's perfectly legal for you to remove the seatbelts from your car, despite Federal requirements. But it's illegal for the entities listed above to do it. (This example doesn't extend to state regulations. It's legal for you to remove your seatbelts, but may still be illegal to drive a car without them.)

There's a short 'discussion' here regarding how to passively detect impaired driving, noting the difficulties of creating such a system. Followed by a note that basically says if they can't do it within 10 years, NHTSA can give up and not do it, as stated in the Infrastructure law.

There's a long section on how to detect various types of impairment, current methods of preventing impaired driving, etc. An interesting section about detecting blood-alcohol level using infrared sensors embedded in the steering wheel. Body posture sensors can be used to detect driver distraction.

This is followed by a brief overview of the technologies NHTSA is considering:

Camera-Based Driver Monitoring Sensors

Hands-On-Wheel Sensors

Lane Departure and Steering Sensors

Speed/Braking Sensors

Time-Based Sensors

Physiological Sensors

On page 850 (21 of the PDF), NHTSA asks for feedback to several questions. There are a few pages of relevant issues, so I won't cover them here. If you wish, you can go here to leave a comment. Please don't leave irrelevant garbage like "I oppose this on the grounds of my Constitutional rights..." While applicable in this situation, it's irrelevant to NHTSA, and commenting like that will just waste everybody's time. There's a section on page 855 (26 of the PDF) about Privacy and Security.

That's that. Let me know I can answer any of your questions. I'll try to come back to this post throughout the day and see what's happening. But, I do not work for NHTSA, so can't remark on agency thought process.

 
 

I'm trying to finish grabbing a show, but Sonarr says the final season is #3, while the rest of the internet (i.e. torrent sites) says that season is #5. It looks like the first 2 seasons were split up into 1/2 seasons when originally shown. So while Sonarr is looking for Season 3, it's finding the first half of what it thinks is Season 2.

view more: next ›