DrownedAxolotl

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (6 children)

LOL! I really wanna see this!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

I agree with you, but you know how Apple operates, slapping a shiny new name on an already existing concept and making it sound premium.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Seriously, I don't know why people are so obsessed with creating pointless discord servers. Is it really that hard to host files elsewhere?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Unless of course a lot of people still there agree with the message that Musk is sending and don't see anything wrong with the content. Wouldn't surprise me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

You may not, but you'd be surprised with how many people didn't even care about WEI, let alone whatever the reasonable option will be

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Understandable. I also had a weaker PC until recently and love what Linux was able to do with it even though I haven't personally tested Alpine. Your rice is also really beautiful for such a minimal system.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'm curious: What made you choose Alpine specifically and what were you using before?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In my experience, it isn't as much about brand loyalty as it is about a mix of convenience and damage control.

For as many faults as Windows has, Microsoft would definitely reel themselves in from jumping the shark. Yearly fees could be justified by saying they're really affordable + you get customer support. Add onto that how entrenched Windows is and how unapproachable the competition is by comparison(seriously, how many computers come with Linux or BSD pre-installed?) and you basically can't lose.

Sure, there will be a subset of people will switch to an alternative or pirate Windows, but regular home users aren't the major source of Microsoft's revenue anyway, it's businesses that largely depend on Windows.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, no way that's gonna happen. They're never gonna kiss those Windows licensing fees goodbye. If anything, they'll double down and make it a subscription. Linux is too free for Microsoft and their shareholders.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Rest assured, I'm pretty confident that won't be the case. While web apps certainly have gained their fair share of popularity, some things still need to be localized on your machine. Chrome OS is just proof of that since it has really taken off after it had forgone its original goal of being fully web based. Last I checked, it even had Steam working allowing you to play games on YOUR computer. Also, keep in mind if your fears did come true, Microsoft would have to run a cloud instance for every single computer running windows on the planet at the same time. This might just be my optimism and faulty assertion, but I don't think that's something they would want to do. A subscription based OS is likely, though.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago (3 children)

First off, I highly doubt the 'cloud only' rumors are true. By definition, an operating system must help the machine itself operate. The only way I see something like that being feasable is if the extra app bloatware is web based, which I certainly wouldn't complain about.

I currently use Linux quite heavily and have a Windows 11 VM on my desktop for all my unsupported software. I am using the Ghost Spectre version and I'm enjoying it quite a lot, it actually makes Windows a good experience. As for 12, I'll wait and see what it's like and decide then (for my VM, not bare metal).

view more: next ›