It's often not a choice between an AI-generated summary and a human-generated one, though. It's a choice between an AI-generated summary and no summary.
FaceDeer
Not in every way. They're cheaper and faster.
Okay, now hit it again.
DMCA is about copyright (that's what the "C" is). The name of a show isn't copyrighted, it's trademarked. Different type of IP altogether.
"Takedown notice" has legal meaning, it's not some random cease-and-desist letter that you can draft for anything you want and that has no legal weight other than that it might be scary.
Some people are so addicted to anger that they'll shoot themselves in the foot just so they'll have something to complain about.
"The gimp" is a character from Pulp Fiction. You're imagining things and refusing to use a powerful tool in response to that imagined slight.
Maybe to make it absolutely clear "I'm getting rid of my grenades, this isn't some trick to suicide-bomb you guys."
Seemed pretty fair and fact-based to me. What bias are you seeing?
Yes, that would also be statistical correlations to an AI model. The specific kind of information they're being trained on doesn't affect the underlying mechanism of model training.
And unfortunately, this article is also just a response to media clickbait, not a discussion point it tries to look like
And becomes new clickbait in the process.
It looks like the ladies approached the soldiers, not the other way around. The soldier speaking was polite, and didn't tell her what to say in response to his "glory to Ukraine." She could have just said nothing. I'm really not seeing a problem here.
Things change. There was a period before this information was easily available; this repository only goes back to 2013. Now there's a period after this information, too. Things start and eventually they end.
Here's hoping that some neat new things start up in its place.