GaryLeChat

Is it time for a fun page on ProleWiki about this? I'd think maybe!

I'm shocked that a nuclear power plant run by a private corporation would ignore safety concerns, leading to a preventable meltdown during an earthquake, and subsequent malpractices!

This was impossible to forecast.

Omg are you saying there might be tankies??????

Based on the proof available to me from your comments, you should stretch your brain every morning lest you pull something from these mental gymnastics you're performing.

They're really going hard against him for not aligning with the US on Ukraine.

Hopefully this stops their deployment.

Lol when citations 2 & 3 on that page literally say the opposite of what they're supposed to be citing. What is this trash 🤣

Don't forget the hundreds of millions spent and still being spent trying to stop them from exploding!

Is this you unironically proclaiming yourself to be very smart by creating an incorrect summary?

After reading the article, I would guess that the blast furnaces are gas powered. Since Britain no longer is purchasing gas from Russia, the price is likely too high to run the blast furnaces, therefore pushing a costly transition to electric ard furnaces.

Just because the article doesn't mention Russia specifically, we must analyze why it is no longer cost effective to run the blast furnaces.

Likely being used as a measure to stop demonstrations opposing the bombing this upcoming weekend.

I liked the part where the commenter blamed the government for shortages and economic instability rather than US sanctions.

I've heard people make the same complaints about Cuba, probably boils down to no material analysis