GreyEyedGhost

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What makes you think that I, posting in a Canadian community about a Canadian article, have a contract with a healthcare insurance company?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Free climbers don't usually die the first time, either.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Housing can't really be a free market for a number of reasons: captive market; regional market restrictions; and high barrier to entry, to name a few.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Here's a link that gives some insight into the situation, courtesy of @[email protected] .

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Way to miss the point. It's a good thing you don't engage in any risky behavior, or anything that would have a negative impact on your health. I mean, it's not like you would be a hypocrite, right?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Or subsidized industries.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The total new car market for 2023 was almost $90 billion. Of that, EV sales count for about 10.7%, or about $9.5 billion. Stats Can provides the first number, electricautonomy.ca was the source for the second, although they got their info from Stats Can, too.

There are a number of possible errors with this data, such as the percentage of EV sales being total sales vs. dollar sales, which would increase the amount spent on EVs since they tend to be more expensive.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (7 children)

So I drink more pop than I should. Why should I have to pay more for my healthcare than my buddy who had a habit of timing running green lights as soon as they turned green. That isn't illegal, either, yet it's very risky behavior. It didn't work out for him just one time, and he nearly died. Why should taxpayers have to pay for him?

The answer is because the vast majority of us engage in risky behavior, or just have the bad taste of passing on our poor genetics to the next generation, and the social cost for penalizing people for not agreeing with societal norms are too high. This includes drug use, even legal ones like alcohol. Sure, don't spend limited resources such as donated livers on people who aren't willing to make the lifestyle changes required to make it worthwhile, because someone else will probably have to die for that to happen. But if we could make new livers and the price was reasonable, I wouldn't even be against that.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

I'll give you an upvote just for knowing what type of gem it was. So many South African diamond mine comments smh.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Assuming each view is a unique visitor, which is highly unlikely, it would only be 1% of our population. This is low penetrative. Now, how many of these visitors were passing on this misinformation to their creditors friends, that's another question.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, the Prius has a lot going for it. I personally would rather have a smaller EV instead, but that's not an easy thing to find right now, either.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This varies from region to region. My region is primarily hydro, in fact, about 0.1% is non-renewable. So, depending on where you live, electricity may be more thermally efficient than ICE. Also, you're ignoring the pollution control aspect. Even if your hybrid is more thermally efficient, it will still generate more pollution than any electrical generation method except perhaps coal, and I'm not certain about that. Your car's ICE engine also won't benefit from any of the upgrades to the electrical grid, while your electric car will. This also may not matter in some regions, since some places like America in general, don't expect to see a reduction in coal use for a decade or more. And yes, I'm aware that the electricity generation mix in America varies a great deal from region to region.

view more: next ›