Grizzly_Biscuit

joined 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

That's...good?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hasn't he "died" like 3 times in the last month?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Ah yes, Shark Boy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Ah, gotcha. Going forward I'll refrain from joking about a different perspective, even if I actually fully agree with the original post. This place rules.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I do, not monthly but enough to say that my own anecdotal experience would agree with yours and this article's perspective. That doesn't stop me from taking a jokingly objective stance. First comment I made was just the reverse angle of the same data set.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I mean with the way the data is presented it definitely is agreeable that the rise in complaints is directly tied to the quality/performance of the flight industry.

But, on principle alone I refuse to openly accept correlation as a causation for two data sets, and always leave room for expansion and more dots to connect. Without that in play, it's easy to convince anyone that all spurious correlations have a cause/effect relationship.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 10 months ago (7 children)

I thought it was funny and I stand firmly by that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Oh...to be honest I think I read the prompt backwards. As a rule of thumb, anecdotes should always be taken with a grain of salt when presented with contradictory empirical evidence.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

Totally unjustified, what did our drones ever do to them?...😬

view more: next ›