JingJang

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lots of meta-level comments here so I'll add one that's more in the weeds:

In an office job, it's always good to be friendly with IT and the office manager/administrative assistant.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a great community.

The Lemmy community is far better than the subreddit

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I prefer a higher priced vehicle with better gas mileage so I save money over the long term while being slightly easier on the environment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it's anything like Google Home and even Google Maps recently, it'll be another push away from the Google-Sphere for me.

Google home just keeps getting worse and Google maps has had incorrect street names in my entire region for over a year and despite multiple attempts to get them to correct them, they continue to be wrong.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm on your side and went to that link.

Unfortunately, the person you are debating is correct. Anheuser-Busch's stock fell over 20% after the boycott began and while it's come up a little since the initial fall it's still no where near where it was prior to the boycott in April.

That said, that might be the ONLY example of this slogan being accurate (at least right now).

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair enough, good reply.

Upvoted :)

(Maybe Lemmy will bring back some good discussions in threads like these...)

I think the public gets fatigued when we hear about the profits these companies make and then we see these comparatively small fines.

If this is how we "steer the vessel of regulation" then I can accept that this is a push in a better direction.

However, I still feel that a fine in the hundreds of millions, ( not bankrupting but a "shot in the leg" versus a "slap on the wrist"), is appropriate for these very large corporations. They already weild so much political and economic power that consequences for things like this should be higher.

In other words, let's encourage them to operate responsibly in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not how laws work.

If you break the law, you deal with the consequences.

It's not a "game system" where additional infractions lead to multipliers of consequences.

Child labor laws exist because we saw what happened in the past when they did not exist. We, as a society, care about our children enough to protect them. That includes preventing them, by law, from working in industrial environments.

Some states seem inclined to repeat the past by repealing or loosening child labor laws... .

Now another child is dead as a result.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Agreed.

I only mentioned my range because then perhaps it would move to a different column in their budget.

25 million is nothing to Amazon.

A couple of billion might move it into an enterily new spreadsheet and maybe even precipitate a meeting to figure out who needs to be fired. Maybe.

[–] [email protected] 144 points 1 year ago (18 children)

This isn't a "fine" to Amazon. 25 million dollars is just the cost of business.

Make this 250 or 500 million and then... Maybe.... it's a fine.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Give me a similar game to Atari 50 but set during the peak of the C64 games and I'd be a very happy guy!

I'd love a remake and commentary on Below the Root, Montezumas Revenge, Raid on Bunling Bay etc.

The Re-booted Yars Revenge on Atari 50 is really fun...