KmlSlmk64

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If someone really wanted to add it, probably the best would be to use unless

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Whatever floats your boat! There are multiple ways of calling it and I've just pointed out the one I find the funniest. What we can all agree on is that renaming Twitter was a bad idea. (and everything else he did also)

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Or you could call it what Linus on Wan show by Linus Tech Tips YT channel made up: ex-Twitter You essentially say both of the names and the fact that Twitter is the "old name". But as a F-u to Musk, we should just call it Twitter.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I would guess that Samsung pay relies on Knox, which gets disabled by blowing an e-fuse, when you run a custom os. But maybe I'm wrong.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (3 children)

IIRC Depends if you talk about cardinal or ordinal numbers. What I remember: In cardinal numbers (the normal numbers we think of, which denote quantity, etc.) have their maximum in infinity. But in ordinal numbers (which denote order - first, second, etc.) Can go past infinity - the first after infinity is omega. Then omega +1. And then some bigger stuff, which I don't remember much, like aleph 0 and more.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why can't you restrict usage if you don't comply with local laws? Why can companies like Facebook restrict usage of their new features like Threads in the EU then? Or some US news network restricting access from the EU?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)

But, like when they would say in their EULA, that people from Texas and Florida are not allowed, then by using the service would be breaking of EULA and the wikipedia foundation could theoretically say that they're not operating there and it's the users fault. Like could someone still sue them then?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (10 children)

What would happen, if they ignored the laws and did not geoblock Texas and Florida, just say they don't operate there, but not restrict the users and still operate the way they operated until now?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What I mean, is that you made me realize what they actually meant, because I've read it as is.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I actually now understand what was meant, because of your comment! I was like Why do they want to receive socialistic agenda later? Incredible what difference a wrong a/e can make! (I'm a non native english speaker, but I think it bothers me/I see it more than the actual natives)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The only problem is if you accidentally include some personal information or other type you don't want to be out there and you've edited it out, you probably don't want it to be accessible.

view more: next ›