Lianodel

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, that's true.

It's just that based on prior arguments I've had, they're just so agitated by thinking things through. even if you put aside the overt heinousness, they just wave away the collateral damage, dismissing them as trivial details as though the whole fucking point of policy is the effect those policies will have. It's partly that they're advocating for awful things, but also frustrating that they are too willfully ignorant to realize how bad their own arguments are.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If only the people who supported regressive, dumbass positions like JD Vance's could be swayed by thinking about things for even a few fucking seconds.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

As someone who got burnt out on D&D, all these updates just seem like rearranging deck chairs on the titanic.

"I want actual DM support, a commitment to better supplements, a working CR system, faster combat with more interesting choices, a clear creative direction..."

"How about balance tweaks to the player classes?"

Ugh. Pass. I'll just try out Pathfinder 2e next time I'm in the mood for running this style of game.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Well before covid, I knew Republicans would politicize almost anything. Covid made me realize I was wrong, because they will politicize literally anything, even a fucking virus.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 3 months ago (17 children)

Sometimes I think about how much art was never created because of capitalism. It either never got funded, or a potential artist never got the chance to make it, because just to scrape by, they had to spend too much time toiling to make some business owners money. It's depressing.

And, just to cut off one potential counterargument: I don't give half of a shit how "good" that art would be. I'm confident there are spectacular works of art that never came to be, but even putting it aside, it's all subjective. Some folks would have loved it, and the artists would have found value in making it. That's more than enough, and a hell of a lot more meaningful than breaking your back working for a living so that other people can own stuff for a living.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It might even be simpler than that. Capitalism just doesn't care past the next quarter. And when ownership is disconnected from labor or even from customer, than it's just a really rudimentary collective intelligence. The shareholders just want the line to go up, and everyone in the corporate structure is accountable to the shareholders, so they all do their part, big or little, to make that happen. It completely dispenses with personal responsibility, whether for negative externalities, direct harm, or even the future as close as months from now.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The last time Google pulled out all the stops to fight ad blockers, I had to update uBlock Origin every now and then until the whole thing passed. That's all.

So I'm not worried. But I am amused that they keep making ads more obnoxious, which pushes more people to use ad blockers. I didn't even use sponsorblock until a particularly egregious bit of native advertising. They could probably gain ground by just making ads less irritating, but they absolutely will not.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

even apart from audio quality, Spotify is just plain terrible as a music library.

For someone who lives in playlists, it might be fine. But I like to pick and choose albums, sometimes even, songs, and be able to navigate it different ways. Spotify, and unfortunately a whole bunch of the competition, will have three separate lists for "liked" songs, albums, and artists. Only want to save the studio tracks, and not the demos and live versions? Fuck you, it's all or nothing! And the special edition is the only version we have! enjoy the solid hour of shittier versions of the songs you actually wanted!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I do appreciate the fact that the Cybertruck was so clearly designed by someone who had no idea how to design a car, and that it's Musk's pet project. It really drives another nail in the coffin of the idea that he deserves all the credit for the work his companies do.

Then again, his most die-hard supporters draw no distinction between ownership and labor. They're also somehow able to look at a Cybertruck and think "Wow!" rather than "Wow, is this some kind of a joke?"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

And will get stained by tree sap. You should avoid the extreme use-case of parking near trees.

It's also why I love the fact that it has a tent accessory, despite being a car that can't handle being outside.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago

Just for context for those who haven't heard the podcast: the Christmas episodes often center around non-bastards. This is one of those. :P

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

I'm more optimistic about Bernie's odds, but whatever, it's just speculation either way. But yeah, a more prominent Bernie campaign would have done a lot of good even if he didn't clinch the nomination. It would have pushed for a more progressive platform for whomever won.

And I'm just so tired of bad faith arguments from people acting like the DNC has no internal politics or even preferences, and that there's nothing weird about the primary process. I once got called a conspiracy theorist for describing how the format of the primaries affects the results, even if you ignore DNC or media influence.

view more: next ›