Mangosniper

And what is when X decides to ban an account you are interested in? You can't do anything against it. In your mastodon you could still read it on that instance. Or maybe there is a client where you can add two accounts and show content of both? And do you think X or Bluesky does not cooperate with law enforcement and gives data if the US government wants it?

Vorlage

Also, wenn jeder Staat seine Wirtschaft auf das nötigste zurückfahren würde, glaube ich schon dass das mehr bringt als alles andere was bisher gemacht wurde. Also nur noch Kleidung, Unterkunft, Essen, Medizin und vll nen Ball und ein paar Bücher für jeden. Will ich so leben? Nicht wirklich, ich und jeder andere hat gesehen was geht und es ist immer schwer was aufzugeben, geschweige denn alles.

Aber hört mich an: Wie wäre es wir bauen alle Geräte so, dass sie doppelt so lange halten wie bisher. Ein Handy 10 Jahre. Ein Fernseher 15 Jahre. Und es muss so gebaut sein dass es nachweislich 99% recycled werden kann. Da würden sich tolle neue Jobs entstehen um die Geräte zu reparieren, einzusammeln zu warten etc.

Aber was sagen dann alle die die Fäden in der Hand haben um das zu tun: “Aber die arme Wirtschaft!“

People will always find a reason to smash their heads, however they call it. All hail to the Allied Atheist Alliance my fellow 🦦

Problem is: who is in charge to write down the thing that is being voted for. E.g. "we need to protect the children" will get my yes vote. However, that is very unspecific and the specific thing could be "we are scanning every text message and sent file on every of your devices to compare that with child sexual abuse images as we need to protect the children". I wouldn't vote for that. So, whoever can frame the question that is beeing asked still directs what is happening.

Uh... from an economic point you just can't split the additional cost in half if it costs 4 dollar more. If something costs 20 dollars to make and they sell it for 25 to price in the other costs and a slight profit margin and then it costs 30 to make when doing it sustainable they can't sell it for 20 + (10 / 2) +5 = 30. They would make a minus then. They could sell it for 35, with gaining the same profit as before.

This is all under the assumption that the original price was a fair price.

Oh yes yes. Of course the time would be enough to apply policies to tackle the problems created by this. However my experience of humanity so far is that those time will not be properly used to tackle the problems 🙃 therefore it will still feel like a cold turkey (IMHO)

Well yes. But it is the same as like quitting smoking and drinking as a heavy abuser from one to the other day. Your next few weeks will be not so cool. On this case it will be not so cool decades

DNA testing that Russian investigators will do in Russia. And as we all know, they are trustworthy as fuck