I'm baitin'
NovaPrime
The research cost recovery line they often yap about is bullshit itself though. The overwhelming majority of pharma research like the one involved here is subsidized through taxpayer dollars already, and they get tax incentives and write offs for failed research. If we had a sane, working government we could nationalize all life saving medications funded by public money while still allowing the inventors to enjoy some (reasonable) economic benefits from the research
That's not a problem with having ethics rules though. That's a problem with enforcement
How is implementing ethics rules and enforcement bad? How can it come back to "bite" them?
Turtle soup
OP is trying to imply that women are paid less then men because they're unwilling to put themselves on the line in tough situations - the woman is ducking in the back while the man is covering Trump out front.
It's a sad attempt at being edgy
Pour one out for a real one. She's bangin' angels now.
Absurd. The court going along with it is even worse in this case
Change your shit asap. Anyone who has access to it can theoretically auth as you on any site or product that uses that 2fa setup. They would still need to have your underlying credentials that would initiate the 2fa protocol exchange anyway, but if they have access to your underlying 2fa secret, its not too far fetched to believe they may have other credentials potentially, depending on how you've secured the access and where you store your credentials. To be safe and not paranoid, it's best to just do a root trust rotation and cycle the underlying auth creds
Fair. I meant more that we should do away with the term as it's a propagandized and charged term