All the Suno tracks I've heard have a similar style. Very procedural and formulaic. Calling it AI seams like a stretch.
Renegade
joined 1 year ago
Relevant article: https://lemmy.ml/post/12857742
Prompt engineering is a thing, but I wouldn't say it's much of a job title. There are people doing it: optimizing system prompts, preprocessing and postprocessing, llms are just one piece of a complex pipeline and someone has to build all that. Prompt engineering is part the boot strapping for making better llms but this work is largely being done by data scientists who are on the forefront of understanding how AI works.
So is prompt engineering just typing questions? IDK. Who knows what those people mean when they say that but whatever it's called there is a specialized field around improving AI tech and prompt engineering is certainly a part.
Nothing in the article corroborated the claim in the title that human intervention made things worse, just that the problem goes deeper.
"AI Prompt Engineering Is Dead" long live LLMOps which is totally not the same thing /s
No actually, the water in spent fuel pools does not contain radioactive material. The water provides shielding. You could hypothically swim in that water just dont dive and also they would never let you do that because it would contaminate the pool.
The Japan Times reported that at Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings' (Tepco) Kashiwazaki Kariwa nuclear power plant officials "confirmed Monday that water from a spent fuel pool spilled over due to the earthquake, but that no abnormalities in operation had been detected". In an update issued on Tuesday, Tepco said: "At the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant, the readings on the stack monitors and monitoring posts installed at the power plant site boundaries are within normal fluctuation ranges, and there is no radioactivity impact on the outside world. The spent fuel pool cooling system is in operation at all units, and there are no abnormalities in fuel cooling. As of 12:25 pm on 2 January, all patrols had been completed and no abnormalities caused by this earthquake were confirmed."
https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/No-abnormalities-reported-at-Japanese-nuclear-plan
The actual paper (emphasis mine):
In 2021, Google’s total electricity consumption was 18.3 TWh, with AI accounting for 10%–15% of this total.2 The worst-case scenario suggests Google’s AI alone could consume as much electricity as a country such as Ireland (29.3 TWh per year), which is a significant increase compared to its historical AI-related energy consumption. However, this scenario assumes full-scale AI adoption utilizing current hardware and software, which is unlikely to happen rapidly. ... A more pragmatic projection of worldwide AI-related electricity consumption could be derived from NVIDIA’s sales in this segment. Given its estimated 95% market share in 2023, NVIDIA leads the AI servers market. The company is expected to deliver 100,000 of its AI servers in 2023.10 If operating at full capacity (i.e., 6.5 kW for NVIDIA's DGX A100 servers and 10.2 kW for DGX H100 servers), these servers would have a combined power demand of 650–1,020 MW. On an annual basis, these servers could consume up to 5.7–8.9 TWh of electricity. Compared to the historical estimated annual electricity consumption of data centers, which was 205 TWh,2 this is almost negligible.
The article:
de Vries has analyzed trends in AI energy use and predicted that current AI technology could be on track to annually consume as much electricity as the country of Ireland (29.3 terawatt-hours per year.)
Headline doesn't match the article.
Got to say I especially don't get the environmental part. Generative ai is not crypto currency mining.
The recovery codes come as a set of numbers
view more: next ›
How's it compare to greenshot?