How do they even legally define what "the LGBT movement" is? Do they think that people are card-carrying members of some official LGBT organization?
Yeah it has big “the CEO of antifa” energy
How do they even legally define what "the LGBT movement" is? Do they think that people are card-carrying members of some official LGBT organization?
Yeah it has big “the CEO of antifa” energy
No need to search when you already have someone you wanna pin it on.
Yeah, blackface is fucked up. And using spiritually significant indigenous clothing to go butt chug booze is fucked up. I think the difference is that blackface was never part of black culture. It was part of white culture. The appropriation part comes from the fact that it’s crossing cultural boundaries.
Funnily enough, lemon squash is what we call it when the elderly play racket sports
Look, just because PHP doesn’t have multiple inheritance doesn’t mean you can’t wildly overengineer everything.
The way people use words online is so debate brained. Cultural appropriation isn’t inherently bad. It’s just a thing that exists and holds connotations about an imbalance of exchange. Is aussie style sushi not still considered Japanese food? Like, we have california rolls, but no one says they’re eating Californian food while eating sushi.
“Lemonade” has several different meanings depending on where you are. Is aussie lemonade carbonated?
I’m a brain broken westerner and all I read was “shop for some cheap vacuum cleaners”. Point me in the right direction, fellow consuuuuumer
If I had to choose one I’d choose one of the ones that’s already going extinct so I could disrupt as few ecosystems as possible
Alternately, is there an invasive species that harms the ecosystems it invades and doesn’t have a non-invasive counterpart? Maybe domesticated cats?
We also experienced an initial explosion followed by a major drop and then steady growth. It’s healthy growth because it shows we’re keeping genuine daily users to compete with natural user churn.
To have such a strong, undiffused, and distant light that it could realistically mimic the shadows on the moon, you would need very modern CGI to replace the shadows of every actor on every frame. Supposedly the recording we have of the moon landing is of a camera pointed at a tv screen because simultaneously broadcasting and recording at the same time was still newer tech that NASA didn’t have set up. And even then, you can see the quick falloff of the shadows and how they run parallel to each other. The sophistication to pull off a fake was just not there.