Snowclone

joined 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Pretty simple reason. Money.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

I'm all ears. Do you think I'm doing this for the sweet sweet 0 upvotes? Or the fact that no one reads nested comments unless they wrote them?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I was asking an honest question, if you're only about shit posting that's genuinely disappointing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I'm not trying to attack or dog pile on you, I just want the rubber meets road pragmatism of what the best action is. What's the reality? I'm already aware neoliberals will not be progressives no matter how much you believe in fairies.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Well. If I take what your saying here out of all the context you included, then you're really not making sense are you?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I can't imagine what you think moderate means. If you're protesting civil rights, you aren't on the fence. You're willing to die for equality. Which there were white civil rights protesters that died [edit: violently murdered] for doing this. They weren't in the middle.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Oh boy. No he has a male to female transgender child, who he intentionally calls by their given name at birth, Also he really switched over to being conservative and anti-trans after said child came out to him. Usually parents go the other way, but he went the extreme hate direction and has seemingly said his child is dead to him.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

There is no excuse or explanation that makes rape and sexual abuse to anyone, particularly children in any way OK.

The point of this is understanding the abuser, how they think and operate to the end that knowing can combat their abuse of others.

To that end, the nuance they are trying to point out is that rapists, while also 90% of the time picking victims they know, aren't sexualizing children, they are raping, the harm and truama is the point, they are sadistically attacking, they aren't sexualizing.

A pedophile is sexualizing children, it's a paraphillia outside of human sexuality. There are people who sexualize objects, actions, things that aren't a part of inborn human sexuality, that's what this is except rather than harmless it's incredible, inhuman harm.

Rapists can wait a long time to find an opportunity to rape their victim, or have detailed plans with lots of preparation, but the underlying motivation of the abuse is rape, attack, harm, not sex or sexuality.

A pedophile will also often have very longterm prep to gain the opportunity to sexually abuse, job choices, religious choices, seeking community positions, and may spend a lot of time grooming their victim for abuse, for them the motivation is sexual. They sexualize children and that's the motivation of the abuse

It's all rape, it's all child abuse, it's all traumatic and life damaging, and should carry MUCH harsher sentencing, it should be up there with murdered 1. But in an effort to understand what is happening and how to detect it, prevent it, or expose it, the researched data is important. There are a lot of adults who were themselves victims of abuse whom spend a lot of time researching these topics to combat them. It's worthwhile.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (6 children)

You can't use "certitude" and "triggered" in the same sentance, it makes you sound like you copy pasted random shit from a script online about how to counter argue anti racism.

Homie, take a deep breath. This is a picture of civil rights protesters being attacked by explicit white supremacists. There's no false dichotomy here. The moderate whites didn't show up to attack civil rights protesters, or kill them, or set up bombs to kill anyone of color in KKK terrorist attacks. They stayed home, and clicked their tongues, possibly wagged a finger. There's no nuance here, you showed up to protest for civil rights, or you showed up to support white supremacy, or you stayed home.

If you think that's ''moral certitude'' (seriously stop using words you don't understand, your embarrassing yourself) you're just a fucking idiot or a white supremacist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Remember when W was the dumbest president we had? Like people mocked the shit out of him, and yet, he read books that would guide his domestic policy actions, showed up to work everyday, and could read at a 12th grade level. What a time to be alive.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (6 children)

So what do you suggest? The guy who's already said he's for genocide?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Oh... it's not even a little. Its pretty bad. Just don't find out about penguins.

view more: next ›