ZMoney

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Not this one. Environmental scientists end up cleaning up after them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Then when you go to grad school you realize you have to like all of them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

How about you only have to work 28.8 hours a week?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

It's fine for a user who needs specific things not that often. I always have to look up how to do anything anyway, and by the next time I do it I've either forgotten or the software has updated.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Haber will obviously continue to be used and work but as long as there's a fossil fuel price to make it happen expect more extreme storms, fires, droughts, floods, ocean acidification, and possibly methane clathrate release triggering a runaway greenhouse effect like during the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I think it's the degree of bullshit that increases gradually. To speak from experience, when you are a grad student you get a feeling like there's corruption but overall your project seems like it's important and making a real contribution (hopefully). You also don't have to worry about where the money is coming from. Sometimes the grant as a whole is total bullshit but there is enough discretionary spending included that great science comes out of it. But you don't realize this until you're writing grants, and by then you're maybe too deep in the game to pull out. Essentially, you end up becoming a manager once you get tenure. There is no epiphany; it's more like a slow creep.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 months ago (3 children)

There is no alternative if you actually want to do science and don't have millions of dollars to buy labs and materials and instruments. Science gets done in spite of everything she is describing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

The use of corn-based feed for animals seems to be a universal trend. In Europe it's done less than in the US, but it's an option everywhere and driven by prices. And those prices do not consider the CO2 cost to the ecosystem.

https://www.dairyherd.com/news/european-cows-eat-more-foreign-corn-global-glut-erodes-price

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Literally impossible, due to energy/biomass transfer up the food chain. The bottom will always be the most efficient.

Picture illustrating this

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Sometimes. Sometimes it's an intro sentence that already has 2 citations and just needs a 3rd, and you just find a paper with more measurements and the same conclusions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Pre-Columbian Meso-Americans were already exploiting nitrogen fixing bacteria with the milpa (corn, beans, squash). Anyway the point is if your yield is dependent on how much fertilizer you produce industrially then the sky is the limit for how much coal to burn.

view more: next ›