apotheotic

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, it is now.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 weeks ago

There's no jubilation at "seeing a big game fail" there's jubilation at seeing a game fail that is developed by a studio that is doing fucked up shit, or a game that is shovelling some fucked up agenda, or the like.

We dance on the graves of any game developed by Actiblizz, Ubisoft, EA, etc not because they are big games, but because they are developed by evil corporations.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago

You're right about the democrats, but distilling trump to "not being polite" is an immense delusion.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Moths are awesome, there's no "Alas" about them!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

I think it may have been removed because it was a misrepresentation of fact.

In case you still want to understand, here's a good place to start:

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

You said in your comment "they tend to have appearances" which in itsself alludes to the true fact that there's some who won't be "covered". I was more upset by your dismissal of their experiences than I was by your game design suggestion.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I think you'll find a good many intersex folk would have something to say about being "covered" by being entirely excluded by your arbitrary choice of categorisation.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Biological sex is far more complicated than small and large gametes. You can choose (somewhat arbitrarily) to define biological sex by one or more of

  • chromosomal sex (which has a variety of variations beyond just xx and xy, so you're fucked for choosing a binary here)
  • hormonal sex (which has a variety of variations beyond just "male hormones" and "female hormones", so you're fucked for choosing a binary here)
  • reproductive sex (which is gonna leave you defining a lot of people quite incorrectly compared to the other criteria listed)
  • how receptive their cells are to particular hormones (which will vary wildly from person to person, so good luck shoving this into a binary)

The only people who think biological sex is a simple categorisation are people who don't fully understand the biology of sex.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

But like, not everybody is born one of two biological sexes, so if we're doing away with societal constructs we may as well get rid of this nebulous concept of a rigid biological sex binary.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

Trans for trans

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

A t4t heterosexual couple 💕

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

Oh actually yeah looking at the momodora character again its not even a resemblance besides the white hair and being a centipede

view more: ‹ prev next ›