dino

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I haven't played Dota2 for years, but the toxicity was a reason I stopped. So I am not sure this thing is effective. I know its a tough task, but still I believe that if one developer can have better solutions to this, than it would be Valve.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I hope you are right, I really like the game and hope they have some interesting fix for toxicitiy and matchmaking.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

hopefully, I just hope Deadlock doesn't get the Artifact treatment

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

no dotted zeroes = no terminal use

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

they would fit into the Deadlock development, imo

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Lol, yea exactly. Thats why electornic devices stop working after their guarantee runs out 80% of the time... ;)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

"open them up"? make them open source or what? thats ridicolous

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago (8 children)

I don't understand this bullshit, if developers/publishers drop their games, just stop investing time into their games or buying from them. How could you force private companies to invest into something which gives zero return?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Old hardware runs better on Ubuntu than on Fedora or Tumbleweed? Nani?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Thanks for this service, but whats the point if the server's cant handle their task?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

pre alpha...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No description... nothing? why should I click?

55
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

So yeah, I want to discuss or point out why I think Valve needs to fix Anti-Cheat issues. They have VAC but apparently its doing jackshit, be it Counter Strike 2 (any previous iterations) or something like Hunt: Showdown the prevalence of cheating players is non deniable. For me personally it has come to a point that I am not enjoying playing those games anymore, although they are great games by itself. But the amount of occurrences being killed or playing against cheaters is at a height, where I don't see the point anymore.

  • Why I think Valve is the only company able to something against cheaters?

Because they have the tools with VAC already aiming to prevent cheaters. Valve has got the resources to actually invest into something more profound which could be used for any game where anti-cheat protection needs to be implemented. And lastly Valve is the company which is interested in furthering the ability to gaming on Linux, the anti-cheat solution needs to work on both operating systems. Only Valve has the motivation and means to achieve that with their knowledge and resources. What do you guys think about the topic? Is the fight against cheaters hopeless? Do you think some other entity should provide anti-cheat protection, why? I skimmed over "anti cheat in linux kernel" posts in the net, but I have very little knowledge about the topic, what is your stance on it?

Edited: Mixed EAC with VAC. EAC seems to be part of Epic Company. Both of these tools seem unable to prevent cheating like mentioned above.

view more: next ›