dlatch

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

There's no way it can get anywhere near that range at full speed. Fighters need to use afterburners to get up to max speed, and F16s run out of fuel in about 10 minutes when using afterburner.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's not the first time, and it has likely caused deaths before due to delayed care: https://www.wired.com/story/ransomware-hospital-death-germany/

[–] [email protected] 52 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Curious to see what the Dutch government will do. They have been one of the most loyal lapdogs of the US and Israel, but with the ICC being in The Hague, going against it is not a pretty look either.

We also have a court that has ordered we can't deliver F-35 parts because it's likely they will be used to commit war crimes, and the government is fighting that order. I imagine the ICC saying the same will not help their case.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

That's not what I am denying, read my comment again. What I am saying is that the warnings are just for show, because if they follow the warnings and flee, the IDF kills them while they are on the run

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Not when reasonable effort to warn civilians is: we're going to bomb you, and if you run we'll bomb you too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The discussion was literally about sanctions. Seems like a reasonable step compared to the "war" you immediately jump to, no?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Ah yes, because telling Netanyahu "please don't bomb children, that is not really nice" has worked out splendidly so far. Diplomacy without being able to put pressure on is nothing more than kindly asking.

Y'know what is the primary method to apply pressure in diplomacy? Sanctions.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Annoying huh, international law against ethnic cleansing. You're not even allowed to give civilians the choice between being forcibly removed or slaughtered. It's antisemitic I tell you, what are the poor Israelis to do?

You know they don't have to invade Rafah, right? It's not like ethnic cleansing is Israel's only choice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

You're not burying people if you don't consider them people taps head

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 months ago

The only thing a ceasefire is getting Israel off scott free after killing tens of thousands of Palestinians, and letting Israel regroup and launch another October - March.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

Imagine coming out of the holocaust, where unimaginable horrors were done to the Jewish people, to then just straight go in to doing the exact same thing to the Palestinians. Imagine being that hypocritical and still think you are in the right. I can't even begin to to think how one could be so stuck up their own arse.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago

If they would stop delivering bombs to Israel, they wouldn't even have to drop this many meals in the first place, saving literally everyone in the process so much pain and effort.

view more: next ›