finn1sher

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

@Tarte That's a great court decision and I love how they understand that's not valid consent!

In the case of a popup or yes/no decision, it makes sense to have two equally highlighted buttons, but I don't think a *slight* highlighting is too much of an issue. The total contrast should be less common though.
@Sprite @xmunk

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

@Jakeroxs Yeah my response was directed at Pratai

[–] [email protected] 28 points 11 months ago (4 children)

@xmunk @Sprite A dark pattern I DESPISE is the public WiFi at a local grocery store - after agreeing to the network's TOS you have to sign up for their newsletter to continue... unless you scroll down and click an un-highlighted button that says "no thanks, take me to wifi"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

@xmunk @Sprite If your design rules emphasize contrast, it would be poorer design to highlight both buttons and it's not in the colour palette to have a 'mild' highlighting like Windows used to have (I think some KDE desktop themes do this too) that suggests which button is the accept button, but doesn't give the other ones zero highlighting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (9 children)

@Pratai @Jakeroxs I hardly use emojis and I don't accept your answer either, because the premise of "nobody old uses them if they want to be taken seriously" just isn't true.

If you base your argument around a fact, which turns out to be false, that's okay, just accept when people point that out, or look it up to confirm or deny your fact.

If you simply think emojis are immature and you don't like them, that's an opinion, which is more respectable.