ganymede

joined 4 years ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

happy to get into into these subtopics, but it's also possible i may not be understanding you properly because i agree with alot of what you just said.

what are you attributing the close to 0 probability to?

if you wanna say "whats the probability that CMG was at least partly talking out their arse about their capabilities (and especially any claim they were currently in possession of that capability)?"

i'd also give it like >90% probability they (CMG) are full of shit. in which case you could say i agree with you (to within say 10% error margin).

if you're instead saying the probability is ~100% that audio surveillance capability cannot possibly currently exist outside TLAs because "someone would've published it already" then i really cannot agree. (and afaict that ars article does not support that stance either)

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

extremely good question to ask OP.

thinking on it right now, perhaps Moon (2009)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Not disputing the three letter agencies

The capability they were claiming to have would make a three letter agency very excited.

sorry i didn't understand. didn't you say you don't doubt TLAs likely already have this capability?

oppressive regimes

most (all?) of whom are operating outside typical legal constraints and likely already have access to the million dollar exploit trade which already exists.

further, i'm not sure how this changes the landscape anyway? its not without precedent that variations on capabilities can be useful to more than one market segment concurrently?

trivial to discover and flag as malware

can you explain further what you mean by this? i'm not sure there's anything trivial about conclusive analysis of the deep complexities and dependencies of modern smart devices

Apple and Google would also be very keen to find and squash whatever loophole let’s them record without showing the notification.

historically we've seen google can take over half a decade to address such things, afaict (welcome correction on this) apple's generally been faster to respond, and i do agree apple's current public image attire would be contrary to be seen to enable this. [not simping for apple btw, just stating that part of their brand currently seems to be invested in this]

in reality there are a confluence of many agendas and there's likely ALOT of global users running non-bleeding edge or other variations on the myriad of sub-system components, regardless of what upstream entities like google implement. if you are aware of any conclusive downstream binary analyses please link

which if true would have been exposed/validated by security researchers long ago.

i agree the probability of discovery increases over time. and the landscape is growing more hostile to such activities. yet i'm not aware that a current lack of published discovery is actual proof it's never happened.

tbh we have our doubts this leak is directly connected to solid proof "they are listening".

but we're not currently aware of any substantiated reasons to say with certainty "they're absolutely not listening"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

well they're an ad company, so being full of shit is pretty much mandatory.

but i'm not aware of any evidence they're actually 100% full of shit on this exact issue or not? can you explain a little more how you know for certain they're full of shit. or you just meant "they're most likely full of shit"?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

can you please explain further what you mean? it could be interpreted a number of different ways.

i'm not sure if this is your point or not? but there is obviously overlap between each of those groups, there's black sixpack dads, and poor/middle class lgbqti etc etc

anyway imo none of this revived division appears organic. there's always going to be the odd biggot, but afaict the majority of modern biggots are being indoctrinated and radicalised by an organised media effort (and our leaders are either complicit or 'inexplicably' powerless at protecting us from it). for sure these radicalised biggots should do better, but we're also talking about average people going up against billion dollar propaganda machinery. it's certainly asymmetrical warfare.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

governments have all shifted more to the right on average

it appears to be the case. though afaict none of it appears to be organic.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

imo honor is roughly a synonym for integrity.

yet integrity means different things to different people.

and people also mistake honor and pride.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

i reckon there's a good chance she was trolling. and if so, fuckin well played.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

noscript is like a screwdriver. umatrix is the whole toolbox.

both have their place

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

not sure if you're being sarcastic, but if anything this news paints linux deployment in an even better light.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

cos nothing proves "microsoft <3 opensource" like releasing a project over ⅓ of a century old

view more: next ›