ghterve

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I call that following the same successful recipe that got us the Falcon 9.

The mindset that considers those tests failures is the same one that would still be in bureaucracy hell determining what 40 year old technology we should repurpose to get a future over budget, late, and under performing solution designed and built.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Well, this stranger is happy for you! Here's to a much happier and healthier future.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

It sounds like you are already doing this!

Congrats and good luck!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Who would want to be a Christian?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure that conclusion follows. There are many more potential future users than there are current users.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Your first sentence suggests you're disagreeing, but nothing you said after that is incompatible with anything gp said.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I have fond memories of using my N900. But I would not have described it as well working :) It worked, sure, but not particularly well.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So someone builds something and offers it to you for free and you hate them because they didn't offer it to you in the way you want it.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

You seem to be doing the same duality thing: "If you are against Trump, you must be pro Biden and that is just as bad!"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The company is cards?

view more: next ›