mac12m99

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (10 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Web Environment Integrity enters the room

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Monthly fee for everyone or you mean freemium? Freemium in my opinion wont be enough to cover the cost, because works well only with services with low cost per-user. And monthly fee for everyone is a very hight incentive of not using YouTube.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Unused ram is wasted ram

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I already know Searxng but never tried extensively, I might give a serious try

I've used duckduckgo but I remember was really slow loading results πŸ€”

For brave search, I've never took it seriously, I should try also this if you say results are good. But how they found themselves?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I've tried time ago but it seems to take the results and nothing else (I mean, no summary on top of the results, no table with restaurant number/time of opening ecc..) -> I don't know how to call this

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (10 children)

I am the only one that use Linux and bing as a default search? (On firefox) I personally think bing have better results than google right now

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

You need a schedulable power source if you want to fully replace carbon. A lot of batteries with super high capacity (that may exists in the future) could stabilize solar enough, and a lot of solar arrays may give enough power, but in summers you you will be forced to throw away some of the energy, which is a big waste. And this is an hypothetical scenario, nuclear is a technology that already exists, we could have decarbonised decades ago using nuclear. -> Don't get me wrong, I don't mean that we should rely on nuclear power alone, but we should first cover the base energy load with nuclear, then use solar and wind for the rest