myfavouritename

I used to have this stance as well.

But my opinion on the situation changed when I noticed the ways that one class is waging war on the other classes in my country. There is real damage being done, real violence being perpetrated. Wage theft, poisoning the environment, suppressing voting and certain kinds of speech. Limited access to healthcare, limited access to education, limited access to the jobs that confer greater respect or mobility. Some people are living in a kind of hell and dying earlier because of it.

And those doing the violence are usually protected from the consequences of their actions by others in society saying just what you've said. "It's okay to protest, but don't inconvenience anyone while doing it". "It's theft to deny me the use of the road that you're blocking with the protest or the building that you're protesting in front of".

I used to think that protests where everyone remained polite were the only ones I could respect. Other kinds of protests, where people were being disruptive were just hooligans acting out. I used to say those things.

Maybe this way of thinking helps to preserve in some small way the politeness of society. I doubt it's effective at doing that in a meaningful way. And if there is a class of people who are oppressing another class, ending that oppression would be the most effective way of increasing the politeness of society as a whole, even if certain kinds of disruption was needed to get there.

One thing that I do know is true is that saying these things does help the bully class to continue doing what they are doing. They aren't going to stop just because someone asked nicely. They are being protected by words like this. And that's not okay.

That's a great point. I suppose one could tell how healthy the relationship is between developer and publisher by looking at how many dev companies on the roster have created a second great game. Of course, that's tough even with a great publisher, so maybe that's not realistic.

Wow. I've always trusted games published by Annapurna to be something exciting, new, and high quality. I'm devastated to hear that this publishing company is floundering.

I found a technique that worked well for me. I want to share with you and others, but I don't want to come across as judging you in anyway. It's hard to find great candidates of any sort. And I wouldn't necessarily recommend my technique to every company, because it's just not reasonable in all cases.

I've found that the best way to get a good mix of people hired onto the team is to do more than hope that it happens.

I had to get out to workshops, conferences, and meetups. Local universities had groups that I got in touch with. I had to make connections with the communities that I was looking to hire from. It was a lot of hard work.

But once you've developed those connections, candidates roll in with surprising regularity for a long time. After two years I had a team of 10 great devs with a 50/50 split between genders and a huge range of background and cultures. It was the most fun team to work with and we made awesome stuff.

I play a lot of board games. And I own a lot of board games. Not all of my games get played very much, so I like to track each play and over time see which games are forgotten gems or which games I'd be best to just trade away.

In the board game community, you might come across people talking about the "Friendless" metric of their collection. It's a totally made up measurement, invented by a person with the user name Friendless. In that way, it's like the Elo rating in chess and other games. I find it's useful to know when I'm "done" with something that doesn't really have an end, like playing board games. You can always play one more game.

Friendless hypothesized that if you play a game 10 times, you've gained 90% of its remaining utility. So after 10 plays, you consumed 90% of the game play that game provides. After another 10 plays, you're at 99%. By the time you reach 30 plays, you've consumed 99.9% of the game.

You can do the same with games. Maybe the number of plays changes a bit. Maybe it's not the number of plays, but the number of hours. I would say that games of Civ are like games of any other board game: 10 = 90% utility gained. Matches in COD, probably not the same.

Gonna piggy back on your comment to agree with OP. I get such joy from reading Becky Chambers!

That is an amazing acronym and I wish to see it everywhere!

Thank you for this! Lots of people online have pushed forward the idea that Google search results are not as useful as before. This was the first article that I've read that did a good job of quantifying what that actually means and providing context as to why it is happening.

Thanks for this! I had no idea about the history of the game.

Damn. I had forgotten what actual journalism looks like. There was actual work done here to investigate and acquire facts. I've been reading "articles" that are just paraphrased PR statements for so long. This was a breath of fresh air.

That sounds incredibly difficult. From some of your other comments, it seems like you're being really transparent with partners about your own challenges. That's impressive.

You are worthy of being loved, regardless of whether or not someone is actually showing you that love. Things can and will change all throughout your life. There's good reason to have hope. Take care.

Wandersong is a game about happiness that made me really happy while I was playing it. Not all the way through; there are parts that are sad too. But I'm thinking of replaying it because it made me feel really happy when I played it the first time.