paris

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I don't wear mine often, but I find that somehow the corners always get smudges on them no matter how careful I am to not touch the lenses. Keep a microfiber cloth around to clean them.

I use EyeBuyDirect for my glasses and don't have any complaints. They come in a box with a microfiber bundle to carry them glasses in and wipe them off with. Obviously since it's online you'll have to be careful about getting a pair that fits correctly, but if you get a temporary or cheap pair in real life that you know the measurements of you can find a pair with similar stats.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Booooo get that ai slop out of here

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The only thing more pointless is our PERFECTLY SPHERICAL ORBS, NOW HALF OFF IF YOU BUY TWO! BUT WAIT, THERES MORE! IF YOU CALL THE NUMBER ON YOUR SCREEN NOW, WE'LL THROW IN A LIMITED EDITION BONUS STAND TO HOLD YOUR ORB! THATS RIGHT, IF YOU CALL NOW YOU WILL GET TWO ORBS AND TWO STANDS FOR THE PRICE OF JUST ONE! CALL 1-800-PONDER AND ORDER YOUR TWO PONDERING ORBS FOR THE PRICE OF ONE!

disclaimer perfectly spherical pondering orb incorporated does not guarantee increased ponderance, seer abilities, or supernatural powers. perfectly spherical pondering orbs are only fda approved for looking at to ponder. do not look at the sun through perfectly spherical pondering orb. do not drop perfectly spherical pondering orb. do not leave perfectly spherical pondering orb in reach of a child. this ad is brought to you by raid shadow legends.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

It varies by person. Some use the word parent, some use mom or dad or both.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

“Regrettably, the number of mortalities reached 1,301, with 83% being unauthorised to perform hajj and having walked long distances under direct sunlight, without adequate shelter or comfort,” the official Saudi Press Agency (SPA) reported.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jun/23/hajj-pilgrimage-death-toll-extreme-heat-mecca-saudi-arabia

That's still 200+ deaths who were registered. And my understanding of Saudia Arabia in this context is that they don't always permit Muslims from certain countries, so they have no choice if they want to make their pilgrimage. This is a once in a lifetime event that some people may plan out years in advance. I don't think it's fair to blame them for not registering, especially when in some cases they can't.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That's the point though. They've done other protest work "the proper way" and nobody knows about it because it doesn't get reported on. They want the message "just stop oil" to be in the news, so they do what gets them in the news.

If they go for the "right" attention, they're barely reported on by two local outlets. If they go for public outcry, they're global news in hours. Their goal isn't to get you to support their organization. It's to keep you talking about and thinking about and caring about climate change.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Available information indicates that it's all processed and stored on-device (and even encrypted). I'll wait for confirmation from security researchers, but the available information I've come across says that it's all done locally.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It's probably not a bluff. They've pretty much saturated the U.S. market; there's not much room left to grow here. It would make more sense to focus their efforts on growing in other regions where they have plenty of headroom to increase their userbase and monetization. Depending on how things play out, they could match their current revenue in a matter of years and still have room left to grow. There's also the potential to re-enter the U.S. market down the line. Why would they throw that all away and essentially create their own competitor by selling their core technology and diluting/confusing their brand with whatever U.S. company they sell to?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It reads as grammatically correct to me. As for the citation, I'll quote what I already wrote in a comment elsewhere:

These are all from the book Ethics: Discovering Right and Wrong (Eighth Edition). It was written by Louis P. Pojman and James Fieser. Cengage is the company selling the textbook.

That final excerpt is from page 89 under the subheader "The Argument from Counterintuitive Consequences."

Anna's Archive has the pdf if you're interested in taking a look, but I don't think I can link to that directly.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I've seen clips and a few trailers and it looks up my alley. Also fwiw I'm studying social and behavioral psychology, not ethics specifically. This is just one of the required classes and seemed the most interesting out of the classes I could choose from.

291
stop doing rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 

so anyways my ethics classes are going great im having a fun great awesome cool fun great poggers time

268
visual coding rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
639
bisexual rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
 
 
 

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

 
view more: next ›