qaz

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
196
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Didn't that mode already exist in the game?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The rule is missing from the title

EDIT: Not anymore

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

You did not follow rule

EDIT: Not anymore

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

He keeps breaking up when girls reach 26

 

Disclaimer this is my own project

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I already did so an hour ago

UPDATE: It has been merged

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Found it while refactoring KDE Connect Android.

 
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

That leg is uncomfortably close to it's eye

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Why would you link to an article that just discusses things said on Reddit instead of just linking directly to the thread?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Wait that's real?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

At risk of dissecting the frog; They think typing C enables fast charging.

 
21
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I was inspired by a recent blog post about contributing to KDE, but just found out I'm apparently blocked. Does anyone know how to resolve this?

 
 
 
 

I'm planning on building a new home server and was thinking about the possibility to use disc spanning to create matching disk sizes for a RAID array. I have 2x2TB drives and 4x4TB drives.

Comparison with RAID 5

4 x 4 TB drives

  • 1 RAID array
  • 12 TB total

4 x 4 TB drives & 2 x 2 TB drives

  • 2 RAID arrays
  • 14 TB total

5 x 4* TB drives

  • Several 4TB disks and 2 smaller disks spanned to produce a 4 TB block device
  • 16 TB total

I'm not actually planning on actually doing this because this setup will probably have all kinds of problems, however I do wonder, what would those problems be?

4
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I'm trying to build a DIY NAS, I already have some (6) 3.5" SATA disks, a Mini-ITX case, and power supply, but I'm still unsure on which motherboard & CPU to get. I think a motherboard + N100 combo is a good option because of the price and power consumption.

I'm currently using a MiniPC with an i5-6500T (4784 passmark) and an external HDD enclosure connected with USB using RAID-1 (software) which uses about 35W. The USB enclosure is limited to 2 slots, and I've heard from here that it can be problematic in combination with RAID. The N100 (5551) boards have a slightly better passmark score but most importantly more expandability (SATA & PCIe) and supposedly a lower power consumption. The i5-6500T has a TDP of 65W, the N100 a TDP of 6W, that doesn't say much but it seems to a lot better when looking at info online. The N100 also apparently has Quicksync support while the i5's support is limited and struggles to encode 1080p (100% CPU usage).

There are 2 main boards I'm considering. The BKHD 1264 and the ASRock N100M. ASRock is a better known brand, but their version only supports DDR4 and 2 SATA ports while the BKHD board supports DDR5, has 6 SATA ports, and has 4 × 2.5G network ports. I've also heard complaints about high temps (90c) with the N100m because it only has passive cooling, while the BKHD board has active cooling and a large heat sink. However, the BKHD board is a bit more expensive (~€150 vs ~€130), but it seems worth it because I won't have to add an external HBA.

What do you think would be the better option?

EDIT 2024-05-26: I ended up getting the ASUS Prime N100I-D D4 because it's significantly cheaper (€95). It does have less SATA ports (1), but I accidentally bought a SATA card so that actually works out pretty well.

view more: next ›