ram

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How long before we find out it always flags certain makes and models as criminals?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Rename Twitter Blue to X Pass

Rename the Post Tweet textbox to the X Box

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Let me know when you know.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (11 children)

It's entirely legal, yes. As people have been saying for years, you don't own the games, you own a license to them.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

a lot of hate for capitalism here

The fediverse is largely populated by 2SLGBTQIA+ people and people of colour who are oppressed by capitalist regimes. The other big contingent is marxists and people who like FOSS. FOSS, at its core, is anti-capitalist.

You're in a place founded by anti-capitalism, that exists in spite of capitalism, asking "why is there so much anti-capitalism here?"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nuke Studio

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

US Courts have already ruled in the past that human authorship is required for copyright. It'd be a logical conclusion as such that human authorship would also be required to justify a fair use defence. You providing a summary without any quotations would likely justify fair use - which is still copyright infringement, but a mere defence of said infringement. A machine or algorithm that cannot perform the act of creative authorship would thus not be exempted by the fair use defence.