Why couldn't they just serve the comments to each client with the ad-adjusted timestamps already? The only thing the client has to request then is the comment page it wants to load, and some unique ID for which the backend remembers which ad version it's associated with.
I will say, for a mainstream US news outlet this article wasn't as bad as I was expecting. Maybe just because there's no way to spin this anymore, but then again some outlets will just parrot IDF statements as fact
Wenn es um etwas geht, mit dem die Liberalen sich identifizieren können: "Anreize schaffen!"
Wenn es um soziale Grundbedürfnisse geht: "Angebot und Nachfrage regeln den Preis!"
"Ha, you have nowhere else to go! We can do whatever we want"
It's great for racing games where you have gradual steering but also quicker response times than with a controller
Awesome, dann kann ich alles mögliche sagen und wenn mich jemand dabei filmt, einfach nicht signieren und der Videobeweis zählt plötzlich als Deepfake..?
TIL it's entitled to ask that software you use is either compliant with the law or clearly lets you know that it isn't, especially when the developers have no idea what the law is
ich warte immer noch auf ihr "unabhängiges Gutachten" u dem was da hinter den Kulissen so abgehen soll...
While I believe that nobody should be able to wield that much wealth in the first place, arguably being a world-famous artist is among the least unethical ways to become rich as long as the artistic work isn't bought from ghostwriters. It takes $10 in net profit from 100m fans to make a billion, and I could easily imagine a sizable crowd of her followers genuinely wanting to give her money like that (whereas, for example, I never would have willingly agreed to give Nestlé's leadership money, even when I used to buy their brands still).
I don't care about her specifically, but from a "owning the fruits of your own labor" perspective, I think it makes sense for the art itself to be a big part of that.
Because I'm just interpreting the statement as it was written while you are reading an additional argument into it that the comment plainly does not make. I suggest you brush up on argumentation theory if that is too difficult for you to understand
The statement I was addressing was where they were called "exactly the same."
You are the one misinterpreting a statement here, by insinuating that the OP's assertion of "exactly the same" was referring to Russia and US as a whole. It wasn't, and so the point you're arguing against is one that OP never made.
Nur noch eine Überwachungsmaßnahme Brudi, dann wird's bestimmt besser