ronondex

Calling whataboutism is a logical fallacy used to justify having different standards for yourself and your adversaries. Anybody using whataboutism in place of an actual can be safely dismissed as a troll. Meanwhile, western media is certainly no less biased than CGTN and has been caught lying about China repeatedly.

What are you on? Whataboutism is not a logical fallacy. We are talking about the bias of CGTN, and you say "what about western media?" Yeah western media are also biased, but it doesn't take away the fact that CGTN is a heavily biased media outlet, highly biased towards positive chinese news. I never mentioned any western media or said they were superior, but to avoid talking about this difficult topic, you change the narrative. Did I mention anything about western media? No! Because that's not the topic.

Whataboutism is not a logical fallacy. Far from it. Whataboutism has been heavily documented as a propaganda technique by many sociologists and rhetoric scientists:

• https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1196123.pdf
• https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1317315.pdf

This is just whataboutism. Talking about the US doesn't remove any critique of china. We were talking about China here. And CGTN (the news source which was linked) has a documented bias towards china

The issue with streaming companies is the exclusivity. I would happily pay for Netfix if I could watch Ted Lasso (= Apple+) and Halo (= Paramount+) on it.

But if you want access to original series you have to buy the platform. I pay around €45 total in VPNs, Seedboxes, Usenet indexers... per month. I would happily pay for Netfix if I had access to everything in the world for up to €50/month. But with netflix you get access to a shitty catalogue on only one device for €8/month... That's not okay for me.