What was I defending and where?
samokosik
When a Muslim is stabbed, no one seems to rant about Iran, Iraq and other Muslim countries making life for their people less unsafe.
On the other hand, the fact someone stabs a Jew, it’s clearly Israel’s fault.
This approach is incorrect no matter what.
Trump, unlike many other presidents, had good relations with Kim and Putin. That’s quite logical - you wanna have good relations with your idols…
Twitter is donald’s « Truth » v2
It’s pretty logical and common for US to support Israel no matter what
Let me ask you a question: Harris Or Trump?
Unless you need fractional scaling
That’s valid. Thanks for clarification.
Sorry, but then I do not understand your logic. To me it seems like you are saying that people should be able to burn Quran (because freedom of speech) but at the same time you believe that burning a trans flag* should not be tolerated. Where is the difference? I am not saying that your opinion is incorrect, I am just unsure what your stand is because suddenly when your logic is applied to a different situation, you refuse to respond
Also, if you believe that ad hominem will make your argument look stronger, then you are clearly wrong.
*Just to make sure: I support all LGBTI rights, I just used them as a comparison.
I would not necessarily say it’s because people don’t understand Muslims. I myself have nothing in common with Muslims, as well.
More likely the case is that there are 2 approaches to free speech. First one advocates for absolute free speech whilst the second is more aligned with "my liberty ends where yours begins" phrase.
No, I just pointed out a trend that is happening in this post. Most of the context you just made up.
Definitely I am not excusing any of Israel’s actions that are truly atrocious.