silence7

He'll spout words, likely ones which make it clear he's going to make good on his side of the oil industry's billion-dollar bribe.

Making that clear to people is likely a big deal

Version 1:

• The world is going to end real soon
• they expect to be raptured away to Heaven
• God put stuff on the earth for us to use up before the rapture

Version 2:

• Somebody else is going to suffer because of the environmental damage
• Hurting other people shows how masculine and powerful I am
• I profit from the damage
• Damage = good

There's a significant impact from the higher temperatures.

It's not just the management history, though that doesn't help.

That's a very plausible claim, but difficult to prove

I'd love to get rid of PG&E and have a publicly-owned utility instead, which doesn't charge the @#$@#% markup the PG&E gets to in order to pay an ever-increasing dividend.

Which is why lobsters have been shifting northward, with populations rising on the north edge of their range, and declining on the southern end.

Not exactly what we want humans to be forced to do.

Per the article, they'll go where people want; not automatically down into "it's God's plan"

Thanks. I somehow missed the copy-paste

Two ways:

• If Republicans control both houses of Congress, they can simply change the law via reconciliation
• He can tie up the spending in pointless bureaucratic procedure indefinitely

He was actively involved in the negotiation of the Inflation Reduction Act and its implementation, only taking on this role earlier this year.

He lives in the US, so it's not a "visit"

What do you mean? This is Brassica oleracea, just like that thing over there.