When talking about vector space, you usually need the "scalar (field)", and scalars need inverse to be well-defined.
So for integers, the scalar should be integer itself. Sadly, inverse of integers stops being an integer, ~~from where all sorts of number theoretic nightmare occurs~~ Instead, integers form a ring, and is a module over scalar of integers.
It is just to consider polynomials and functions as vectors, and apply our meager intuition on 3d spaces. By introducing norms (size), you recover the "size and direction" analogy.
As a TA who barely did a class, so relatable
Infinitesimal approach is often more convoluted when you perform various operations, like exponentials.
Instead, epsilon-delta can be encapsulated as a ball business, then later to inverse image check for topology.
Thanks, I dunno how but this let me see the joke
Welp, that means I set up my neovim with rust as well.. will do when I got time!
Is rustlings a game? Where can I find it? I can only find a project
Seems like getting even more attention, potentially thanks to ShrΓΆdinger effects
Stokes theorem in disguise
Then there is "vector is one that transforms like vector"
Too technical of a meme
Tbh I do not know how many lie on the between, it rather depicts me in undergrad.
This one comment of 4 words triggers me so hard that it momentarily stumped me