starman2112

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Aaargh it looks so cool and futuristic but I know it's impractical as hell

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

"But the kids today are so much more violent!"

Nah, you just see kids being normal amounts of violent because they have cameras on them 24/7

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

A chance to post that meme I made!

"Let me put it to you this way, Tav. You can buy better games than Solasta, but I like Solasta. Yes, it has a linear story, and the voice acting is rather stiff, and you can't multiclass, but–it's brilliant!"

I don't actually know that I would say BG3's story is undeniably better. It's more polished, sure, and it's more open-ended, but that doesn't necessarily make it better. Granted I'm not done with it yet so I can't say for sure, but I really like Solasta's story, especially the second campaign.

I think there's also something to be said about having four fully voiced player-made protagonists instead of one silent protagonist and a ton of NPC companions. There are scenes made up entirely of your party talking to each other. Which like, yeah, BG3 has that too, but Astarion and Shadowheart aren't mine. Nora and Crag were. The writing isn't as tight, the voice acting is relatively amateurish, but I like it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Legitimately could be a use case

"Attend this meeting for me. If anyone asks, claim that your camera and microphone aren't working. After the meeting, condense the important information into one paragraph and email it to me."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're not wrong. I would say they're functional junk. They're definitely cheap, but they got my prescription spot-on , and it took me like 4 months to notice the slight warping on the lens. If they weren't all I can afford, I would buy from elsewhere, but they aren't the worst thing I've had to compromise on for price. I wish my cheap junker car worked as well as these glasses.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Zenni as well here. Overall I'm happy. To answer your question: the website has a semi-functional "virtual try-on" that works well enough for checking the look of glasses. I only used to it gauge the size of them, because I have a big head.

Worth noting that if you have a strong prescription, you're going to pay more wherever you buy them. I have a -4.5 cyl number, and the glasses I wear now cost around $100, despite the frames starting at like $25

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

And also that time you refused to finish a book series because it had a gay and a nonbinary character in it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

"What's the best company to give control of my thermostat to?"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm extremely skeptical of medical diagnosis AIs. Without being able to explain why it comes to a conclusion, how do we know it won't just accidentally find correlations? One example I heard of recently was an AI that was extremely good at detecting TB... based on the age of the machine that took the x-ray. Because it turns out places with older machines tend to be poorer, and poorer places tend to have more TB.

The only positive use I can think of is time saving measures. A researcher can feed a study to ChatGPT and have it write a rough first draft of the abstract. A Game Master could ask it for inspiration on the next few game sessions if they're underprepared. An internet commenter could ask it for a third example of how it could save time.

But for anything serious, until it can explain why it comes to the conclusions it comes to, and can understand when a human says "no, you're doing it wrong," I can't see it being a real force for good.