this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
1209 points (94.4% liked)

linuxmemes

20408 readers
961 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 32 points 11 months ago (3 children)

The reason you expect this is because Windows has a file lock behaviour that won’t let you delete a file when it’s in use, in Linux this limitation doesn’t exist.

Raymond Chan, arguably one of the best software engineers in the world, and a Microsoft employee, has repeatedly lamented the near malware like work arounds developers have had to invent to overcome this limitation with uninstallers.

Think about uninstalling a game. You need to run “uninstall.exe” but you don’t want uninstall.exe to exist after you’ve run it… but you can’t delete a file that’s in use. Uninstall.exe will always be in use when you run it….so how do you make it remove itself?

Schedule a task? Side load a process? Inject a process? Many ways…. But most look like malware.

Linux has never suffered this flaw.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This seems like a pretty specific use case, but also pretty common. A system function to delete the file that called it should cover that entirely, but I guess psudo-malware is acceptable?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Pseudo-malware is pretty much the way to go as a developer in my experience.

I believe his suggestion of a javascript file that deletes itself works only works because javascript gets sandboxed and doesn't suffer from Windows "flaw" with file locks.

https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20230911-00/?p=108749

While Raymond does offer a solution he's also completely side stepping any responsibility on Microsoft's part in creating and perpetuating this problem without offering their own native solution.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

That last bit IMO is one reason to argue against him being the best software engineer. He might have the skills, but they are offset by his conflict of interest with MS.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So what is the solution on windows?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Generally the solution is to do something that looks like malware, or use a third party feature that side steps the problem, as happens with javascript.

https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20230911-00/?p=108749

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I made a Batch uninstaller (to one of my other bat scripts I think), and it could remove itself without any problem just with the command "del whateverthenamewas.bat"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, because the bat file isn't actually running, it's just a list of commands cmd should execute.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Yup, CMD acts as a parser / runtime and the process is bound to the CMD binary, the script file is being run by CMD which keeps a copy of it in its own working memory in RAM