this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
1345 points (100.0% liked)

196

16224 readers
3935 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1345
AI rule (media.infosec.exchange)
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago (2 children)

No you don't understand, the machine works exactly like a human brain! That makes stealing the work of others completely justifiable and not even really theft!

/s, bc apparently this community has a bunch of dumbass tech bros that genuinely think this

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This but mostly unironically. And before you go Inzulting me I'm an artist myself and wouldn't be where I am if I wasn't allowed to learn from other people's art to teach myself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

don't dismiss me, I like being spit on

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Having a masters degree in machine learning doesn't make you an artist grow tf up xD

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

No, but drawing for last 13 years of my life does.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

And this, is a strawman. If this argument is being made, it's most likely because of their own misunderstanding of the subject. They are most likely trying to make the argument that the way biological neural networks and artificial neural networks 'learn' is similar. Which is true to a certain extent since one is derived from the other. There's a legitimate argument to be made that this inherently provides transformation, and it's exceptionally easy to see that in most unguided prompts.

I haven't seen your version of this argument being spoken around here at all. In fact it feels like a personal interpretation of someone who did not understand what someone else was trying to communicate to them. A shame to imply that's an argument people are regularly making.