this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
426 points (99.3% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The embattled congressman isn't running for reelection after the panel found "substantial evidence" of federal crimes

The House Ethics Committee has found “substantial evidence of potential violations of federal criminal law” by indicted New York Congressman George Santos, and are referring the matter to the Justice Department. Santos announced that he will not be running for reelection in 2024 shortly after the committee released its report.

“If there was a single ounce of ETHICS in the ‘Ethics committee’, they would have not released this biased report,” he wrote, adding that he “will … NOT be seeking re-election for a second term in 2024 as my family deserves better than to be under the gun from the press all the time.”

The ISC report found that in multiple instances, Santos moved funds donated to his campaign to his personal checking accounts, and used the money at luxury store Hermès, OnlyFans, Sephora, as well as for meals, parking, and to pay off his credit card bills. His FEC reports included payments for Botox, a luxury vacation in the Hamptons, taxis and hotel stays during his Las Vegas honeymoon, and spa treatments.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 52 points 10 months ago (3 children)

He didn't even go to a competent doctor for the Botox:

“[T]his expense was not reported to the FEC and was noted as ‘Botox’ in expense spreadsheets” turned over to investigators, it continues. The session took place at Mirza Aesthetics, a Manhattan medspa run by a doctor whose license was suspended in 2021 over breast and penile enhancements gone wrong.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is penile botox a thing for any reason? Because somehow I picture this guy being obsessed with penis size or his inability to last longer than 3 thrusts or something.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (3 children)

the botox was to remove his penis wrinkles

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I thought he wanted egg smooth balls tbh.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

It was to go with his egg smooth brain.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

You didn't let me finish... would you suck THESE balls?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

You'd need a lot of botox, given that he is a penis wrinkle.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

penis wrinkles = prinkles

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't expect to ever find out.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Biish please, we're on the Internet. You will learn.

"A tiny needle is used to administer the Botox into the penis. The clinical impact is that the patient's erection becomes stronger, harder, and longer lasting"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but I have no idea whether that's one of the places that George Santos got his Botox.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

the giveaway is that when he smiles his cock doesn't move.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Living on the edge, man