this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
173 points (96.3% liked)

World News

38188 readers
1978 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 59 points 9 months ago (4 children)

There it is, Israel is annexing Gaza. No more Palestinian state.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (6 children)

The Palestinian state is in the West Bank (about 16x the land area of Gaza).

It would be more accurate to say that the Palestinian state lost control of Gaza to Hamas, and Hamas is losing Gaza to Israel.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 9 months ago

Because the west bank isn't under IDF occupation yet? Every day settlers are carving out chunks of it, and there's checkpoints everywhere.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The Palestinian Authority only has exclusive security control of roughly 18% of the West Bank -- Area A. However the IDF basically enters it whenever they deem it necessary anyway, so exclusive is a misnomer.

The PA has joint security control with Israel in 22% known as Area B. The rest of the West Bank -- 60% in Area C -- is under direct Israeli control. Area C is where all the illegal Israeli settlements are. Palestinians are also pretty much never granted building permits, etc in Area C. And it's worth noting that Areas A and B are non-contiguous as dotted islands of control inside of Area C.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It would be more accurate to say Israel is stealing it

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

The West Bank is a Bantustan. Plain and simple.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

It would be more accurate to say that the Palestinian state lost control of Gaza to Hamas, and Hamas is losing Gaza to Israel.

Not wrong, but same outcome.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I'm not really sure what other outcome Hamas thought there would be when they launched their Oct. 7 attacks and then are continuing to hold hostages. Widespread killing and sexual violence launched from Gaza against Israel, killing ~1,400? Whether or not you agree with Israel's actions since then, it should've been apparent to anybody that Israel was going to retaliate in a major way, they shoot kids who throw stones at them, like they weren't going to respond with a massively disproportionate show of force. I guess they wanted to spark a greater war against Israel in the Middle East, that seems like the only other outcome that "makes sense", but does the rest of the Middle East care that much about the Palestinians to get into another war with Israel? It sucks for the people caught in the middle just trying to live their lives.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

Hamas didn't have a plan beyond "shake the hornets nest and hope the other side puts us in a better position after the rubble is cleared." They just wanted to cause a disturbance that would put them on the world stage again.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Gambling that Arab states actually give a shit about Palestinians beyond what domestic political advantage they can provide is a bet that hasn't generally paid off.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I think they're still not entirely over the whole "Jordanian king visits Al-Aqsa and gets assassinated by Palestinian terrorist" business from way back in 1951.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdullah_I_of_Jordan#Assassination

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Hamas took hostages so Israel would come after them of course. They'd been unsuccessful provoking them with small attacks prior.

Sadly for the Palestinians, Hamas is actively trying to use them as war propaganda by forcing a war and as much suffering as possible. Why? To isolate Israel and soften it up for the larger attack.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago

Hamas took hostages because hostages are one of the few ways they can secure concessions from Israel. This is the status quo Israel created in 2006.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

By this logic, Israel had already annexed all of Palestine before the 2005 withdrawal.

Not to mention, Israel has managed security in the West Bank forever. If Ramallah has actually been annexed, it's rather strange that you won't find any Jews there, and that it's actually illegal for Israelis to even visit this apparently annexed territory.

Perhaps the situation is slightly more complex than that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

Security for Israelis, not for Palestinians.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Israel bans Israelis from visiting Ramallah because they don’t want Israelis interacting with Palestinians, and especially shopping in Palestinian businesses.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 9 months ago

If I were Israel, I would also retain security controls there for some time. Though, I am quite afraid how "security controls by Netanyahu" will look like.