this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
1553 points (97.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

5030 readers
350 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Yeah I'm not gonna lie this is me. I've burned iso's to CDs before but I really not get it. The cds I had could only be burned once and then got write protected and I didn't know how to undo to. I'm just gonna stick with my flash drives

[–] [email protected] 40 points 8 months ago (3 children)

They're not "write-protected", they're literally a write-once medium. The name "burner" isn't a metaphore, that's actually what they do.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Tbf there are absolutely rewritable CDs and DVDs:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD-RW

Though compatibility with regular players was a bit of a crapshoot.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's true. CD-RW "burners", to keep accurate phrasing would've been well described as "melters". They melted the medium, and erasing it was just melting it back.

I still miss them, so convienent in the mid 2000s era cars that could play CDs loaded with decent quality MP3s.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

But I remember you could only do it X times before you'd actually be able to corrupt your data. Never had that happen, but it always felt a bit scary.

To be fair, practically every medium from tape to HDD to SSD has a limit. But CD-RW was a lot more vulnerable to data loss in my memory.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There was some kind of “append” mode on CD-R though

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

Correct, but only if the disk did not get finalized. Most cd burning applications and what was built into windows towards the end of that being relevant allowed for burning some data without finalizing the disc, but that is not the case generally when you are burning an iso.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Oh haha, I didn't know that

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Flash drives are definitely better than burning ISOs to disc, but don't forget that we had CD-RW discs that allowed multiple burns.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Just in case you don't already know this: of you're frequently fiddling with ISO files on a flash drive, go check out Ventoy! It lets you put multiple iso files directly on the drive and will offer a boot menu of which one to use. It's brilliant. Plus you can still use the rest of the space on the stick for regular storage as usual.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In HS photography class the teacher gave us CD-RW discs to use as flash drives to keep our pictures on and they actually lasted all semester using them every day.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

i never thought the rw discs worked well enough to be trustworthy but for the application you described ie not critical it did the job. damn i remember those days. so glad about usb drives and now i guess everyone just uses cloud.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

CD-R vs CD-RW.