this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
1377 points (94.9% liked)
Gaming
2739 readers
232 users here now
!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we donβt take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.
Our Rules:
1. Keep it civil.
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.
2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.
I should not need to explain this one.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.
Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Whats wrong with Unreal engine? π€
Most devs either don't or can't bother with proper optimization. It's a problem as old as Unreal Engine 3, at least, I remember Unreal Tournament 3 running butter smooth on relatively weak computers, while other games made with UE3 would be choppy and laggy on the same rigs, despite having less graphical clutter.
That doesn't sound like an engine problem tho
I could write a whole essay on whats wrong with UE from a players perspective. But here's the skinny.
Light Bloom, Distance Haze, TAA and Upscaling, no visual clarity, Roboto Font for 90% of all UIs, lower framerate for distant objects, no performance diffrence between highest and lowest graphical settings.
The only good looking and optimized UE games come from Epic themselves, so basically just Fortnite (RIP Paragon). Most of the games released by third parties are Primo Garbagio. They run like ass and look like ass.
Literally all of that is in control of developers. Don't blame the tools.
But UE is the common denominator for all those problems. I actually don't know any positive examples for UE. Satisfactory, maybe, but it still checks most of the issues. They are just less prevalent because the game itself is good.
Ruiner, Ghostrunner and DmC are the only UE titles I have played and they are all FLAWLESS.
predecessor is shaping up to be a good replacement for paragon. im hoping in doesnt die before they get out of early access
What's wrong with Roboto though lol? It's my favourite font
There's nothing wrong with it. It just doesn't fit everywhere. There's a thematic difference between Action platformers, Horror and Milsims, yet they all use the same font and UI. Imagine if most games would use Naughty Dogs "Yellow ledges". It would get old very quickly.
Enormous resources hog
It also has A LOT of benefits and can run very demanding games well while other engines struggle.
It's incredibly well optimized for what it's doing.
Some devs just enable raytracing and make it a requirement, to not care about properly optimized alternative lights and shadows stuff.
Doesn't sound like a game engine problem
Same as using an AI in games is not an AI problem.
Correct. If you build a house with cheap labour and bad materials it's the builders fault. That doesn't make all houses bad and unreliable.
I mean, if the world makes it very convenient to use such instruments and call the task finished, this is not okay. I wish at some point we would come to conclusion that we need to optimize the code and software products to reduce CO2 emissions or something, so devs' laziness finally becomes less tolerated.