this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
567 points (96.9% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump biographer raises questions about his wealth as campaign donors foot the bill for his many lawyers

Former President Donald Trump’s PACs have spent about $50 million in donor money on his legal bills last year, sources told The New York Times.

The “staggering sum” spent by Trump on his legal fees and investigation-related expenses is about the same amount his lone remaining GOP primary opponent Nikki Haley raised across all her committees last year, the Times’ Maggie Haberman and Shane Goldmacher write. Federal Election Commission filings this week are expected to detail the full extent of Trump’s “enormous financial strain,” they added.

Trump, who has a penchant for relying on campaign donations to pay his lawyers if he actually pays them at all, has used his Save America PAC to cover his legal costs. When the PAC ran low on cash last year, Trump asked for an unusual refund of $60 million that had been transferred to the pro-Trump MAGA Inc. PAC. Trump has also been directing 10% of donations raised through Save America to a PAC that primarily pays his lawyers, according to the Times.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 81 points 7 months ago (10 children)

How is it legal to use campaign funds for personal legal costs?

[–] [email protected] 94 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because laws that are not enforced are nothing more than friendly suggestions.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Over ten years ago Colbert showed how PAC money could be legally transformed into a personal slush fund. It was a hilarious segment that he did over an entire season to show how the Citizens United law allows anonymous money to go right into politicians' pockets. He won a Peabody award for it.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Citizens United will be the death of this country.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 7 months ago

It's payback for the genocide and slavery, probably.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Stephen Colbert: 'I am a Super PAC and So Can You'

YT / Piped

Making a better tomorrow… tomorrow.

Wish I could find the original announcement. Here’s a follow up from his show (YT / Piped). I’d forgotten about Ham Rove!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

So many even bigger assholes have appeared that Carl Rove hardly rates anymore.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

The Emoluments Clause has entered the chat

Emoluments Clause: "I'm interested in that answer too"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

I think you mean the Emoluments No-Claws

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Same answer, even.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The emoluments clause does not apply to Trump he isn't a federal office holder.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

He was when he was receiving the emoluments.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago

It’s legal if you accurately specify where the funds will be going. Iirc, his website states that funds will go to legal challenges or whatever.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

This is Donald J. Trump. Since when has something being illegal ever stopped him?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Republicans always turn a blind eye to their own.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

They aren't campaign funds. They are funds donated to a Political Action Committee (PAC).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The funds are coming from a PAC. I'm hearing the rules are different from normal campaign contributions.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

A PAC is a fancy name for Bribe Collection Fund.

It's not illegal if you run it through the correct laundering methods.

It's what happens when the rules are being made by the recipients of the bribes.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Anthony “my son gave Trump 250 Million dollars, also money is speech and corporations are people” Kennedy is laughing at us.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

I think it's technically not, but there's a million loopholes.

Even if it is illegal, what are you gonna do? Charge him? Get in line.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Pretty sure you can use raised funds for anything as long as you disclose what you're using it for. The questionable part is when he sends an email from his campaign saying "Trump needs your help to stop the woke mob" or whatever and then in the fine print says "money goes to [some ambiguously named PAC called like 'USA Defense" which was created just to pay Trump's legal bills)"...he technically didn't say it was for his political campaign.