196

16224 readers

3935 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

847

rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

107 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Imagine on top having very sensitive information from your medical records public. Imagine you are dropped out of the most prestigous top athlete bracket, because your body fat ratio increased half a percent too much after you had an injury.

Isn't that already a thing for sports with weight classes? Having fairer matches makes things more interesting in all divisions.

You don't even need more divisions. Just more precise ways of making them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

weigth classes are much more broader. Your weight does not tell more about how your body is constituted than can be seen from the outside already.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

It gives no more information than body fat percent. Unless you're already making an assumption about body fat %, muscle %, height, etc, you can't guess someone's weight from the outside.

For the top end of cycling (and probably other endurance sports), things like V02max for top athletes seems be pretty common knowledge already. But I'm not sure how objectively that can be measured if someone is intent on suppressing it to stay in a certain bracket. So height would still probably be more useful, at least for flats.

Imo, either make divisions based directly on factors that matter, which varies from sport to sport but most often comes down to things like height and weight, or get rid of them.