this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
85 points (89.7% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This guy is a known misinfo spreader.

Yep, they weigh more. Yep, they'll lose about 100 miles off their range after 100k miles.

So what? Diy replacements are doable, it's a 6-800v device (nominally), but you'd hire a professional to do an engine swap.. or do proper research to understand what you're dealing with.

What do you get after replacing a battery? A fully functional car. Still has its dings and dents, but still accelerates incredibly, has almost no maintenance items based on the simplicity of an electric motor, reliability of a solid state control system.. how's your ice doing after several hundred thousand miles? No co2 output at the pipe, right? No constant oil changes, right? No packing two complex automotive systems (electric and combustion) into one vehicle frame... Right?

Sheesh.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Lol. You're the one spreading misinformation. For one, you aren't getting to do a battery swap at home. You don't have the capability of swapping out and moving around an 1,100 pound battery.

You can also pay someone to do an engine swap and parts and labor will cost you less than $8,000. Often less than $5,000. A battery swap will cost triple the amount. Sometimes more.

The range loss in cold and mileage time and warranty info are all easily verified. Just go look it up. Pull your head out of your ass.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Lmao I work on systems intimately related to this stuff, it must be fun being this consistently wrong, because you're hell bent on sticking with it.

What a low-quality mechanic: moving a pack requires a pallet jack, or in a pinch, several furniture dollies from harbor freight, at $30/ea. Lifting into place, several scissor jacks. I mean really, aren't you embarrassed by your lack of creativity? You poor man.

JuSt LoOk iT uP, how embarrassing. Durability of the packs is generally guaranteed for 10yrs of full cycle usage. What's a cycle count as? Full charge to full discharge. How many people do that? It's easy to do on a very small cellular phone battery, you're less likely to feel comfortable doing that on a large vehicle.

The point is, you wear out your pack, the rest of the vehicle keeps running for another decade after pack replacement. The worn out pack is recycled, and new fully capable packs are made using the recycled filtered lithium. Less energy is required overall, by reprocessing a pack, not an entire vehicle.

I don't care Cole. I'll always fight your lack of knowledge and understanding wherever I see you, forever. I enjoy it, and will wear you down with the technical truth, not what the media or your dim friends parrot to you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Funny, cause if people weren't starting to see what I've been saying, then all the auto manufacturers in the US wouldn't currently be scaling back their EV sales projections.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

🤦 got it, moron. None of your points relate to why companies are scaling back, it's been repeated in many different articles at this point: "targeting the small population of wealthy with SUVs and luxury cars is a strategy guaranteed to quickly reach saturation".

Sheesh, try reading a little.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh. You must mean trickle down economics. Lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Lmao dude you are really good at being dumb. Hey, fuck you for dragging the gene pool down.

I'm against trickle down/bull and sparrow economics. I'm saying EVs should be aimed at the working class, not the wealthy class as has been the case.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Funny, you just said it was going to the wealthy. Even those shit boxes nissan are releasing cost $60,000+ if you want a 250+ mile range.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Read the part in quotes more carefully. It's saying that targeting the wealthy with EVs is a bad long term strategy.