politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
And if he cuts Israel loose, he loses MORE votes AND donations thanks to the large block of Jewish voters and fundraisers.
He's taking a calculated risk. Yes, supporting Israel might cost him Michigan, do you want him losing the Jewish vote which then puts states like New York, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, and California in play?
He has a path to victory without Michigan, he has NONE without California and New York.
https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/jewish-population-by-state
https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/contrib?cycle=2018&ind=Q05
He is not losing NY or CA over this or virtually anything else
Supporting israel does not have to mean blindly continue their Genocide. Surely there are more moderate options
There are many Jews that oppose what israel is doing right now.
Jewish Voice for Peace estimates more than 1,500 protesters calling for permanent ceasefire blocked cars amid holiday traffic
The remaining ~~Jews~~ Zionists can choose between having a ceasefire in Gaza or the guy which had a book of Hitler quotes next to his bed
Oh no, doing the right thing has a risk of downside! No one has ever faced such a moral dilemma before.
I wouldn't want to be associated with anybody who thinks that what's going on over there is okay and needs my guns or dollars to enable it.
He needs to sack up and tell Israel to give Netanyahu the boot or we are not giving them any more money.
I won't really be happy until Netanyahu is sitting in the hague with all of his little genocidal cronies.
I cannot for the life of me understand why we NEED to be funding this... I understand the history, I read up more about the arming of Israel to get them up to speed, but now they're fully capable of creating their own arms and have an arms industry that's as advanced as our own. They don't need us anymore. but nope, gotta maintain that "relationship" so we can protect our oil interests in the middle east... As usual it's fucking oil...
Drake meme: social spending here that cost 1billion+ nahhhh!
Sending 1billion+ for weapons to Israel, yeahhhhh!
They want this war, let them fund it...
At this point, it's not about needing to support Israel, it's all about needing the campaign donations.
Nobody is going to let Israel twist in the wind with millions of dollars on the line.
https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/contrib?cycle=2018&ind=Q05
It's not just Michigan. There are many battleground states where his campaign is at risk without Muslims and Black people, and there's no way he's winning at all without high young progressive turnout (one of, if not the, most important factors in his 2020 victory). Also the Jewish community in the US is very much not a monolith regarding Israeli aid.
Florida also has a large population of Jewish voters, although the state has been trending red in recent election cycles.
Yeah, no matter what he does, he's not winning Florida. ;)
It went Blue for Obama twice, Clinton once and Carter, but it's ruby red otherwise.
Look at the guys they keep electing to governor...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_DeSantis
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rick_Scott
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeb_Bush