this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
10 points (91.7% liked)

World News

38188 readers
1978 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I don’t blame them. Ukraine needs to take the war to Russia to win.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The UN isn’t in charge of war crimes. Since the power systems are used to fight a war. They are legit targets.

It’s explained to you in the cite I gave you. It’s hard to take you seriously when you try to cite the UN who put Iran in charge of human rights.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The UN isn’t in charge of war crimes.

Neither is Duke. I would call an international convention of nations far more legitimate than any college on this matter.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Then were the charges? Where is the UN voting to use force to arrest Putin ? Exactly. The UN is worthless.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Lol so fucking what? You're wrong dude, it's ok to admit it. There's no shame in being wrong.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I’m not wrong. You claim it’s always illegal. Yet your cites don’t say that. My cites say it is lot always illegal and explains why.

We are talking about Ukraine attacking Russia. You are trying to oddly cite Russia attacking Ukraine.

Just take an l and move on or actually cite your claim

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I didn't think I had to say this, but I'm arguing an ethical position that happens to coincide with international law. I think it's always wrong to bomb infrastructure. In this war between Ukraine and Russia, it's a definitive war crime and it would be a violation of international law for Ukraine to strike a power plant in Russia.

The ethical position is that civilian infrastructure like power plants, hospitals, dams, bridges, etc should never be attacked. This is because fake justifications can be made to attack that infrastructure, as we see in Israel's genocide.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ethics is different than law.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Nice observation. I'm arguing 2 compatible things simultaneously, one is legal that obviously has exceptions. The other is ethical to argue that the "exceptions" are just excuses for killing civilians.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

The geneva conventions and other treaties that established what we call the international conventions on warfare were not written by he UN, amd the UN has no jurisdiction on them. The geneva convention was held in 1864, about 80 years before the UN was formed.

The ICRC is the jurisdiction in “charge” of defining warcrimes.

In any case, warcrimes are contextual. Bombing a power plant in one instance may be a legitimate target in war, while in another case, where Russias goal was to cause civilians to freeze and suffer, may very well be. However, I am not a lawyer of the international criminal courts.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Again, so fucking what if the UN isn't directly involved with charging and sentencing war crimes. The UN, the ICJ, and the ICC are all international organizations. When one makes a claim, it's highly likely that the others will follow suit.